Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
12°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Saturday, September 19, 2009 8:36 AM CDT
COLUMN: When the darkness descends, look for a light



About the nearest I ever came to truly understanding the fears of a parent involved a toddler niece, a borrowed shotgun and a rocking chair on a hot summer night.

I was guarding her from potential harm after a porch exploded in flames on a family member. What happened? Let’s leave it at this: I intended to shoot to kill that night if anyone I didn’t know came toward my niece.

So I can understand some of the anxieties felt by parents, especially when they think someone is trying to ram something down their child’s throat.

That still doesn’t explain some of the rage and end-of-the-world angst over President Obama’s speech this month. But parents want some control over things. And some felt they were losing control when the speech came up.

It’s somewhat understandable. We keep hearing about fighting, bullying, alcohol and drugs, guns, gangs, cheating and so much destroying our schools these days. Parents today can’t understand why everything seems to have deteriorated in American schools.

Well, the only problem with that lament is it ignores the simple fact that schools have faced those problems for years.

During my years in high school there were lame fights, half-wit bullies and spoiled, lazy kids showing up drunk or high to class. Some students “modified” their hunting guns in shop class, too. There was even streaking. Yes, in my day you didn’t have to go onto YouTube to see nudity in school.

And a few years before that my sister joined in a sit-down protest outside the school. Not really sure if it was over Vietnam or the limited food choices at lunchtime, but I remember at dinnertime that night Dad got into a shouting match with my sister. For awhile I could see in Dad’s eyes he was furious over losing control of a part of his world.

Other things haven’t changed for schools, either. Teachers get blamed for students not learning when education is actually a two-way street. Some adults say education is a waste of time and unnecessary to succeed in the world. Some of the education critics aren’t self-made, either. We all can’t inherit starts in life.

Fortunately, some parents realize that when they instill reading and learning in their children it pays back. My parents were blue collar but they definitely cared about our schooling.

As a child I used to read the Compton Encyclopedias in our house. It was a way of opening my eyes to education. Sure I would catch episodes of “The Wild, Wild West” and “Get Smart” and play “Army” with my friends outdoors. Yet those thick books opened up my world to reading and learning. But TV and day dreaming made me an underachiever until college forced me to get serious in class.

Though I am not a parent I have tried to instill that love for learning through end-of-the-day visits this year to a local elementary school. It involves brief talks on history and for some reason the kids were not all snoring when I finished. (I’ve noted it helps to offer some malted milk balls every now and then to gain their attention.)

I still don’t understand why parents wouldn’t want their children to hear a speech on the importance of education from a once awkward, open-car-door-ear boy who grew up to be a Harvard graduate, book author and president of the greatest country in the world.

Yet parents face a lot of stress these days. It is a struggle from the time the alarm goes off until they place their heads on the pillows at night. And I would never question their concern for their children. I just want the parents to chill out.

It was once said that cursing at the darkness is not the answer. We must find and light a candle.

That night I gripped that shotgun and feared what might approach out of the night. But I was comforted by the peaceful bliss of my niece curled up and sleeping in a chair. My heart was racing, but hers was at peace.

She convinced me that terrible night everything was going to turn out all right in the end. Now I try to gain the time to drive south for a visit with her children, including a daughter who is a mirror image of her.

From that night I’ve learned fearing the darkness is not the answer.


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


Mike P wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:43 AM:

" If you have ever sat out at night, with a flickering candle, lantern, or fire, it can offer some limited warmth and a short range of comfort, with a perception of safety.

Shadows dance, at the borders of the illumination, and to the faint of heart or already agitated, this too can be troubling. This setting is prime for spinning tales, bringing listners to the edge of their seats, and looking around just to the edges of their limited range of lit up protection.

Even alone, or sitting quiet, the mind wanders, small movements or noises rev it up even more. Adrenaline rises, and the minute hairs on the back of your neck begin to tingle. What just moved over there? What was that noise? It sure sounded close and menacing. Then noisily bursting through the brush, or across the lawn, comes the family dog or cat, or some other non threatening curious visitor.

Often simply turning off the light, or moving out of its range, and letting your eyes adjust to dimmer conditions, can actually give a better view of your surroundings. You are less visible to possible dangers, and not as easily tricked by dancing shadows, and noises seemingly just outside the light.

Fear is an old tactic. A bunch of folks constantly afraid of their own shadows, aren't as likely to unite on much of anything. Folks who seek expanded knowledge and understanding of big and small issues, tend to be less manipulated as easily by scare tactics. Many people outgrew being afraid of the boogie man, but still manage to get their buttons pushed to fear a wide variety of mysterious dancing shadows in the distance. Many groups like to push those buttons to have fear constantly be the buffer of people actually uniting on much of anything. Many don't want to risk unity on issues upsetting the status quoe, and marginalizing their ability to manipulate sympathies and fears to focus specificly limited unity in the directions they want, when they want them to.

FDR said we have nothing to fear but fear its self.

I don't think this means we should be fearless to the point of being careless, but if fear is the focus, the issues can get clouded by the edges of the security lights we huddle together or alone under. Our effective range of vision is limited, and we tend to sit out even more exposed and vulnerable.

Foes, dangers, and risks, aren't to be simply ignored, but they shouldn't dictate how we live from day do day, either. Some folks have different fobias, that can control various aspects of their routines, or even their entire existences. Some of these fears can be a danger in themselves, because of the panic and flight reactions that get triggered. If the danger is real, running to the light, may actually be the worst place to be. Sometimes, a few deep breaths, and turning the light off, are more effective in both concealing you and your situation and offering a broader less frightening view of what lies beyond the porch. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 19, 2009 4:57 PM:

" I still dont understand why parents wouldnt want their children to hear a speech on the importance of education from a once awkward, open-car-door-ear boy who grew up to be a Harvard graduate, book author and president of the greatest country in the world.

Because too many folks believe the propaganda being spewed on talk radio and Fox news 24/7, Herb. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 20, 2009 7:51 AM:

" Harry Potter wrote on Sep 19, 2009 4:57 PM:
" I still dont understand why parents wouldnt want their children to hear a speech on the importance of education from a once awkward, open-car-door-ear boy who grew up to be a Harvard graduate, book author and president of the greatest country in the world.

Because too many folks believe the propaganda being spewed on talk radio and Fox news 24/7, Herb. "


I don't know Harry. I think it has more to do with fear. I believe people today do not trust the Government. They are tired of their lives being used for political gains. They want the Government, not just one party, but the Government in a whole to do the job they are sent to do. It seems like every year it gets worse and worse. That We The People lose our voice to what the Government believes is better for us. Look at some of the recalls on products, that the Government says, "Your not smart enough not to use this wrong so...". I will admit I was worried about his speech, but I read, learned for myself, and if they would have had it here in Mattoon. I would have not had a problem with it. No I don't believe it's a party thing, but a Government thing. To many lies from both sides worries the American public. "

Airy Dite wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:35 AM:

" It's too bad that teachers get blamed for students not learning. Of course, there are some who shouldn't be teaching. But it goes back to the adage "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

I went to a top ranking high school with award winning teachers but not one of them could teach me algebra. They led me too it, but I just couldn't learn it. It wasn't their fault by any means.

From my viewpoint now as a former teacher(not algebra)and grandparent a lot of students and parents are just concerned with being entertained.

And Herb, I got a lot of enjoyment and entertainment reading the World Book Encyclopedia when I was growing up. "

techman wrote on Sep 20, 2009 7:55 PM:

" Fox news had nothing to so with the fear, it was the Department of Education's discussion points. If HP and others started getting their news from media outlets that are tied into this administration, they might become aware of "the rest of the story". The Presidents speech had obviously changed as it was nothing compared to the discussion points presented the week before. Of course, had any republican President desired to talk to the school children the NEA would have gone nuts. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 21, 2009 6:51 AM:

" You assume too much techman. As a news junkie, I watch them all. I also realize that the MSM media leans to the left. The good folks at MSNBC are just as slanted as those at Fox. I don't think a person can formulate good ideas without listening to all sides of the debate. I have seen a lot of right leaning people openly admit on this very site that they only listen to Fox for all their news, and have to think they are the ones not getting "the rest of the story". The most valuable lesson I have learned in life is to think for myself and you can't do that without looking at all sides of any debate. Getting all of your informaation from one source does not allow one to do that, and it doesn't matter if it's from a right or left point of view. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 21, 2009 7:32 AM:

" I don't know Harry. I think it has more to do with fear. I believe people today do not trust the Government.

You could be right, jr. But I think Fox pushes that fear and mistrust more than any other network. I find it interesting that during the last administration they were cheerleaders for the Bushes policies and now have done a 180. I don't think a news outlet should have an agenda, and that goes for MSNBC too. The problem occurring, in my opinion anyway, is that this agenda is finding it's way into reporting the news of the day, both at Fox and MSNBC, and to a lesser degree in the MSM. This issue is being further pushed by the fact that some people actually consider talk radio as news. Unbelievably, some like Fox's Hannity are now calling their programs news.

You say people don't feel they can trust their government, but can we trust the news? Given that all news outlets seem to have an agenda these days, I would say the answer to that is rather obvious. "

The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:30 AM:

" The difference between Fox News and MSNBC, Harry, is that Fox News lies and MSNBC does not. Both have a point of view, but only one of them regularly lies to support it. "

The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:31 AM:

" By the way, the news media does NOT "slant to the left." It slants to the corporate viewpoint, and heavily so. "

father bob wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:11 AM:

" The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:31 AM:
" By the way, the news media does NOT "slant to the left." It slants to the corporate viewpoint, and heavily so. """"


correct TQ. it was Karl Rove who vilified the "media" when they began to question motive and report proof the country had been duped into war in iraq. lies from the whitehouse and the president's cabinet were being brought to light, and the criminals had to create controversy. "

even steven wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:57 AM:

" Bahaha... that's hilarious! MSNBC is just the propganda arm for GE. I love all the lefty FOX News haters on here. It's interesting that the hacks at the old media propganda outlets refused to report about ACORN and refused to acknowledge the hundreds of thousands of TEA Party protestors in Washington DC. Then, like clockwork... like they were handed scripted talking points from the sniveling pukes at the DNC, the old media outlets came out with the stale old "anyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist" lie.

The old media is dying because they no longer report unbiased news. The worst example perhaps is the New York Times, a once prestigious paper that's been ruined by lefty, Pinch Sulzberger. It's been reduced to a bird cage liner... complete with editorial content in front page "news" articles. It's also going broke as subscribers and advertisers dwindle. I get news from a variety of sources, and it's pretty clear that the lefty old media ignores stories that would cast their preferred party, Democrats, in a bad light. Where are the hard-hitting stories about Charlie Rangle, for example? Here's some elected crook who cheats on his taxes while at the same time writing tax code for everyone else... hmmm.... nope, no story there.

While FOX is markedly to the right of old media propganda outlets like CBS, NBC, and ABC, it's also the only television news outfit that reports stories the other won't... and the left hates FOX News for it. FOX News haters are ridiculous, thin-skinned little partisan people who can't stand to hear criticism or news that one of their chosen is incompetent or a crook. They see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil... remaining content and blissful in their partisan ignorance. "

TheInformed! wrote on Sep 21, 2009 1:40 PM:

" The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:31 AM:

" By the way, the news media does NOT "slant to the left." It slants to the corporate viewpoint, and heavily so. "

The coporate viewpoint would not be the left it would be the right. Why would a company encourage new regulations, rules, laws, taxes, and red tape. We need to quit thinking about us vs them and start thinking about what is really going on. Ask yourself this question. Do I want to make choices for myself or do I want to let the government do it for me? If you choose the latter Europe would love to have you. America was built on individual freedom. "

The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 2:19 PM:

" During the last election, thanks to a relentless GOP propaganda campaign aimed at know-nothings, craven and wretched reporting by the corporate media and the general thundering stupidity of the American public, what we were offered as "issues" were such topics as Hillary Clinton's capacity to blubber tears, Barack Obama's middle name, the fear of his "secret Muslim religion," whether he and his wife treat each other to "terrorist fist bumps," and his bowling score.
This was what the voters in this country supposedly wanted to discuss while deregulated financial fraud collapsed the world economy. Just before the election, 23 percent of the brainless population in Texas reported that they thought Obama was a Muslim. MORE THAN 40 PERCENT in Florida and Ohio said they did not know what his religion was.
With this nation populated by people as ignorant as the right wingers who watch Fox News, it's lucky we're not all dead already. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 21, 2009 7:29 PM:

" " The difference between Fox News and MSNBC, Harry, is that Fox News lies and MSNBC does not. Both have a point of view, but only one of them regularly lies to support it. "

I wouldn't argue with that, TQ. My only point was that like Fox leans to the right, MSNBC leans to the left. However no network could tell lies on a daily basis like Fox though. They must think their viewers are stupid to do that, and I have never seen a right winger willing to admit that they are biased. All we hear is about how fair and balanced they are. I haven't even looked at their on line page yet today, and I'm willing to be there's more than one article bashing Obama. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:32 PM:

" Harry Potter wrote on Sep 21, 2009 7:32 AM:
"You say people don't feel they can trust their government, but can we trust the news? Given that all news outlets seem to have an agenda these days, I would say the answer to that is rather obvious. "


Oh I agree, they have all gone past news to pushing agenda's. They all need to get back to informing the public of what is happening, not what they want or believe should happen. Basically the news has become nothing but editorials. Look at when the President gives a speech. The editorial coverage from differing news agencies takes longer then the speech. Depending on which you watch they either have people on condemning, or backing the speech. One must watch the differing agencies and then take half of each to find the real story. I also commend you on not following the line and saying that MSNBC slants also. They all do and anyone who doesn't think they do needs to take a step back and look again. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:34 PM:

" The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:30 AM:
" The difference between Fox News and MSNBC, Harry, is that Fox News lies and MSNBC does not. Both have a point of view, but only one of them regularly lies to support it. "


I don't know if you can say they all lie, but they ALL have an agenda. Fox does as well as MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and all the others. "

The Question wrote on Sep 22, 2009 9:46 AM:

" Some journalists have no agenda but the truth C-Span, for example. Journalists may not be able to be purely objective, but they can and should try to be fair to all sides in a news story.
And advocacy journalists, while admittedly biased, can do some good by exposing truths other journalists have failed to expose for example, that cigarette smoking causes cancer. The mainstream American press ignored that scandal, which killed millions, for more than a decade because it was addicted to tobacco company advertising contracts which forbid discussion of the issue.
Although bias, a tendency to lean in one direction, should be avoided by rational people who are seeking the truth, some practices are far worse than bias, and those include the willingness to LIE to support your cause. The party man is of necessity a liar, as Nietzsche observed.
People who are biased blind themselves to certain aspects of the truth. Propagandists who lie work actively to kill the truth. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 22, 2009 10:08 AM:

" Thanks for the kind words. jr. What I find particularly bothersome is when I read things like the story of the Fox producer who was caught on film cheering the crowd on at a recent tea party. An executive from Fox acknowledged that her actions were wrong and says she was reprimanded. When you consider that Fox seems to have made it their mission to discredit the current administration at any cost, I find his response rather questionable. Yes, I acknowledged that MSNBC tends to lean left, I was referring to their pundits. No network blends their punditry with actual news like Fox. Just look at their lead stories on their on line site for instance. At times every item highlighted is negative regarding the White House. I don't see that angle on the other networks, at least to the degree you see it at Fox. And bear in mind that Fox, unlike any other news network is headed up by a political operative, who just happens to an extreme right wing Republican. I guess I long for the days of having a Walter Cronkite reporting the news of the day. The trust he inspired in the American people was best noted when Nixon was reported to have said "when I lost Cronkite, I lost the battle over VietNam." "

father bob wrote on Sep 22, 2009 11:02 AM:

" The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 2:19 PM:
"
With this nation populated by people as ignorant as the right wingers who watch Fox News, it's lucky we're not all dead already. """"""


and we may well have been if not for the media exposing the lies of the whitehouse. president cheney and rummy wanted to nuke iran. which would have given the russians and chinese the right to fight over what parts of this country they each want. "

medic57 wrote on Sep 22, 2009 3:20 PM:

" Because too many folks believe the propaganda being spewed on talk radio and Fox news 24/7, Herb. "


Harry

I watch Fox and believe most of it, however, I still believe schoolchildren should have watched the broadcast. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:53 PM:

" ... president cheney and rummy wanted to nuke iran

I heard Hannity trying to make a case that the NYC cops should arrest a foreign head who was here on UN business. Of course he got the idea from an article in Murdoch's NY newspaper.

Boy, those right wingers sure talk tough.

Oh yeah, we need those nutbags back in the White House. lol!

Let's see now, here are some brilliant ideas from the party of no. Invade and occupy Iraq, nuke Iran and arrest the head of a sovereign nation. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 23, 2009 11:50 PM:

" father bob wrote on Sep 22, 2009 11:02 AM:
" The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 2:19 PM:
"
With this nation populated by people as ignorant as the right wingers who watch Fox News, it's lucky we're not all dead already. """"""


and we may well have been if not for the media exposing the lies of the whitehouse. president cheney and rummy wanted to nuke iran. which would have given the russians and chinese the right to fight over what parts of this country they each want. "


I have seen where Cheney mentioned using Nuclear Weapons but that Bush wanted Diplomacy.

"The vice-president, Dick Cheney, has long favored upping the threat of military action against Iran. He is being resisted by the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and the defense secretary, Robert Gates.

Last year Mr Bush came down in favor of Ms Rice, who along with Britain, France and Germany has been putting a diplomatic squeeze on Iran. - CNN Jul 15, 2007

I have also read from CNN were only the extremist would believe that Bush would want a nuclear war, same as extremist on the right say things about Obama and his not being a legal president. "

 


COLUMN: Walk, relay, fight, pray: just get out there and get busy for all those who can’t

COLUMN: When the darkness descends, look for a light

COLUMN: 'Trials, Tribulations' a polished portrayal of an historic event

COLUMN: You can't please all the people all the time, but you can spend time trying

OUR VIEW: Rasmussen long an important contributor

OUR VIEW: Campus communities make us better

LETTER: Health care system is beyond repair

LETTER: New law said to lower consumer utility bills

LETTER: Add these folks to the health care reform mix

LETTER: Deceased truly was late for his own funeral

LETTER: Flags should be at
half-mast on Sept. 11

OUR VIEW: MAP cuts hurt today's students and tomorrow's leaders

LETTER: Time for taxpayers to make a difference

LETTER: President's allegiance
is to the 'radical left'

LETTER: Health care reform starts with providers

LETTER: Hypothetical example could be alarming

LETTER: Government reigning in private sector blunders


 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content