Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
12°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:42 PM CDT
Gun control mainly about the ‘control’



What don’t you understand about gun control?

When thinking about this subject, two words come to mind that relate to our condition or position on the subject of gun control.

Some of us fall into one category, and others may slip into the other.

Unfortunately, most of what we think of and how we behave as the average American certainly falls into one of these categories.

I believe that we are very fortunate to live in the best of times, in the best country and finest society that has ever existed since time began. But I also believe that it’s slipping away while we sit idly by and watch it happen. I am not a doomsday prophet or anything like that, but I’d like to think that I see our personal freedoms and constitutional rights situation either more clearly or with more interest than the vast majority of our voting neighbors. Actually, that’s not exactly right; I don’t want to see the situation more clearly. I want to share some thoughts that may make you look at our positions in a different light.

First of all, get the ideas out of your mind that our elected politicians have everything under control and all have of our best interests at heart. Secondly, bear in mind that they work for us; we are not subject to their personal agendas and wishes based on lobbying efforts. We can make differences if we will pay attention, be vocal and vote accordingly.

If we as average, normal, working class citizens will think and talk about subjects that our forefathers felt so imperative to our rights and the eventual survival of our society, we can make a difference. The liberal activists on these subjects are vocal and very active. We must be also!

The two words mentioned above are “apathetic” and “pathetic.”

Most of us have become apathetic over time. The thesaurus defines this word as being “indifferent, lethargic, listless and unconcerned.” We simply let others take charge of the decisions in the everyday workings of our worlds and we rest assured that our legislators will all make those decisions that are good for us. Isn’t that about where we are? We get excited and even upset over bad calls in sporting activities such as ball games, but we let our politicians erode our personal freedoms without even a groan. It’s time to get excited about those things that affect our Second Amendment rights and other personal freedoms before it’s too late!

Just in case you’ve forgotten your grade school class that discussed the Constitution, the Second Amendment was designed to give us the right to bear arms. It says: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This and the Christian principals that were the basic foundations of our country are being misinterpreted and undermined by groups and individuals with undesirable intentions while we sit back and say nothing.

Radical individuals and groups seeking to destabilize the very and basic principals that our great country was based upon make a lot of very elegant noise while we sit back quietly and think that all of this stuff really means nothing to us. Unfortunately, many of these campaigners of “control” speak very eloquently, very loudly, and relentlessly. Couple that with the recruitment of many celebrities and Hollywood stars and you get a very believable group of control advocates, many of who do not see the whole picture or realize the eventual effect that the demonizing of our freedoms will have.

In summary, all of this proposed additional legislation is not about gun control. It’s not about guns for hunting or personal protection. It’s not about ammunition. It’s not about reducing violent crime. It’s not about protecting children. It’s not about animal rights. It’s not about hunting. It is about control! It makes all of us more dependent on government and less self-sufficient. It diminishes our personal freedoms and reduces us to subjects who are controlled by and indebted to our government rather than citizens who control our governments actions through the constitutional processes of free elections, freedom of speech, etc.

The second word was “pathetic,” meaning wretched and miserable. All of those who continually undermine our personal freedoms with items such firearm legislation fit this description. Many of these individuals and groups have agendas designed for their own purposes, not the overall good of individuals and our country. It is only through individual freedoms and rights that our country can gain back and strengthen the country as a whole. If individuals are stronger, then the country is inherently stronger.

Regain a voice in your local community and among your friends and relatives.

The route to proper success in maintaining your personal freedoms is through the actual use of the freedom of speech not just the existence of the same.

Watch how your politicians vote on important issues and make educated judgments rather than believing in their televised rhetoric. In short; Judge the tree by the fruit it bears!

Parting thought:

“Honor, justice and humanity forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage on them.”

— Thomas Jefferson, “Declaration of the Causes and Necessities of Taking up Arms,” 6 July 1775

It’s faith, family and freedom.

Dave Shadow is the Journal Gazette/Times-Courier’s hunting and fishing columnist.

 


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


jackinthebox wrote on Sep 18, 2009 12:40 PM:

" Great article Dave and you are so right. "

nutjob wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:15 PM:

" Actually Dave, the Second Amendment to the Constitution does NOT give us the right to bear arms. Instead, it was put in the Constitution to protect the inherent right that was already given us by our creator. Notice, " The Right Of The People To Bear Arms... Shall Not Be Infringed". Although I agree with what you are saying in the fact that the groups who wish to disarm America, peaceful law abiding LEAGAL citizens, only wish to disarm for the sole purpose of total control. The fact that alot of people refer to the Second Amendment as giving us the right, is quite the opposite of what was meant by our founding fathers. Please, in future reference, be sure to properly state what is written. Thanks. "

Harry Potter wrote on Sep 18, 2009 7:59 PM:

" Watch it Dave, they'll be coming for your fishing poles next. lol! "

kamfong wrote on Sep 19, 2009 6:02 AM:

" I'm going to get my arm cut off,and have a laws rocket attatched in it's place,let them try to take that. "

JWT wrote on Sep 19, 2009 9:06 AM:

" I notice you mentioned "liberal activasts" but fail to mention the "radical right wing"?
Let it be known that there are a lot of "liberal activasts", including myself, who are buying up guns. Not just the radical right wingers. "

singlewheel wrote on Sep 19, 2009 9:31 AM:

" dave: i have followed your column in the j-g for some time. have enjoyed your fishing reports from my old stomping grounds. this column begged for a response. you have hit the nail on the head in a great way. keep up the good work. florida has a much better attitude on the subject of fire arms. i think cook county has taken over the whole state since i left 30-odd years ago. danny gray (your ol achool mate) "

M wrote on Sep 19, 2009 6:46 PM:

" Excellent letter!
Another of Jefferson's quotes:
"The beauty of the 2nd Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it away." "

Cognitus wrote on Sep 19, 2009 9:36 PM:

" I see JWT referred to "activasts".

Actually I thought his post was
half-"vast". "

Mike P wrote on Sep 20, 2009 6:04 AM:

" I haven't really heard much, on any new pushes. Here is a site listing legislation from the Illinois state rifle association,

www.isra.org/legislation/

it gives Bills, their positions and comments on them, Status, what has passed or hasn't, is still moving, or is in limbo.

Concealed carry referendums passed or failed last Nov?

I did see where felonies using BB guns, or even paintball guns I think, may get a different look, come next year.

Various new laws have been signed, and could use not only just being listed, but a laymans heads up as to what they mean and when they start. I think these are just some of what I noticed so far. Changes to landowner hunting permits requirements. Land is to get rounded to next whole acre, so only 39.5 is needed to qualify now. Something was in the pipe on deer permits possibly being available at places that sell hunting licenses and bow tags, and ending the lottery for firearm season permits. I lost track of its scope and status. I think it was in signed stuff I stumbled across, but am not sure, or if I read and understood it correctly. Legislative legalese, is hard to follow sometimes.

I know the last week of the year, tid bits of new laws get thrown together, but some could use more of a heads up than others, some stuff takes effect immediately upon being signed, and many new rules, laws, and changes, don't get discussed or mentioned much, if at all. "

The Question wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:35 AM:

" Thomas Jefferson never said any such thing, M. It's not even his style of writing. You right wingers have no intellectual standards at all anymore, do you?
GunCite, a pro-gun website, puts it under the heading of "More Bogus Quotes." The "quote" is not to be found in Jefferson's speeches or personal correspondence and has never been cited in law journals by Second Amendment legal scholars. "

M wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:00 AM:

" "The Question wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:35 AM:
" Thomas Jefferson never said any such thing, M. It's not even his style of writing. You right wingers have no intellectual standards at all anymore, do you?
GunCite, a pro-gun website, puts it under the heading of "More Bogus Quotes." The "quote" is not to be found in Jefferson's speeches or personal correspondence and has never been cited in law journals by Second Amendment legal scholars. "

Well good for you, TQ. You caught me. I am....God forbid...human. I am so terribly sorry that due to my trusting nature I didn't fact check before posting such a menacing quote. Is this the only thing you ever do? Sit around trying to pick fights? You must truly be miserable Quote Czar. "

prairieguy wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:49 AM:

" Virginia Tech "

The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 10:42 AM:

" Yes, M, it does bother me when the opinions of ignoramuses are attributed to our most intelligent president by people who are either too lazy to check their facts, or aren't really interested in facts at all. "

father bob wrote on Sep 21, 2009 10:55 AM:

" M wrote on Sep 21, 2009 9:00 AM:
"Well good for you, TQ. You caught me. I am....God forbid...human. I am so terribly sorry that due to my trusting nature I didn't fact check before posting such a menacing quote. Is this the only thing you ever do? Sit around trying to pick fights? You must truly be miserable Quote Czar. """""


speaking of czars. just how many did bush have?.....oh yeah 47!..and if you're irresponsible enough to post drivel and bogus information, you should expect a backlash.....but again you rightwingers know very little about fact or truth. "

BW wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:32 AM:

" M, You are very perceptive. Sitting around trying to pick fights is PRECISELY what TQ does. Oh, and lately he seems to have become the spelling monitor (or czar). "

father bob wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:59 AM:

" HEY HEY!!!!.....a disgruntled gun freak! can the gay bashers and anti-abortion nuts be far behind?

let all the magpies and lemmings ooze out of the woodwork!

the JG-TC should FIRE Shadow.

petition anyone? "

CrowWoman wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:27 PM:

" M, what you should ask yourself is how many lies you have circulated due to your "trusting nature." I hope now you'll make sure your information is accurate before you pass it along to someone else, or even post it. "

M wrote on Sep 21, 2009 5:27 PM:

" Trust used to be an admirable trait. Now it is perverted into a tool in an attempt to drag decent people down to the depths of the miserable and bitter. Do you not see that changing the meaning & over-analyzing the simplest of things to support your ego creates chaos & confusion? The idea that you can muddy the water enough so that hopefully you will float to the top is pathetic. Another new low has been achieved. Congratulations.

"The Question wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:35 AM:
Thomas Jefferson never said any such thing, M. It's not even his style of writing. You right wingers have no intellectual standards at all anymore, do you?"
"father bob wrote on Sep 21, 2009 10:55 AM: and if you're irresponsible enough to post drivel and bogus information, you should expect a backlash.....but again you rightwingers know very little about fact or truth. "
"CrowWoman wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:27 PM:
M, what you should ask yourself is how many lies you have circulated due to your "trusting nature." I hope now you'll make sure your information is accurate before you pass it along to someone else, or even post it. "

All of this, ridiculous "backlash", over a single-line quote that is widely accepted as one of Jefferson's and referenced in a small-time, local rag. Thanks, watchdogs! America is so much better off with you on duty. "

Likestoknow wrote on Sep 21, 2009 7:00 PM:

" Nutjob--You wrote". . . the right that was already given to us by our creator." Would that be the same Creator who said "Thou shalt not kill?" And, many of us have spoken--we just had an election--remember? "

The Question wrote on Sep 21, 2009 8:55 PM:

" The Thomas Jefferson quote is an easily traced lie. Took me all of 30 seconds to explode it.
"Trust" but verify, M. You forgot what one of your little right-wing heroes advised you, in a genuine quotation. "

CrowWoman wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:56 AM:

" Those who post and forward false information are the ones who have helped pervert trust, M. You have also destroyed your own credibility in that you seem more upset about being caught than you do about posting a lie.

I've noticed that conservative Christians like to quote the founding fathers. Whether you're a Christian or not, I don't know--I hope not, since you clearly are not concerned about telling the truth--but I have known several Christians who forward false information on the internet. I always correct them if someone's reputation is being hurt by the info they're sending out.

Assigning a quote to someone who did not make it is fairly benign, though it certainly doesn't help your cause--especially when you attack those who catch your mistake. You should thank us for helping you become a more credible source of information, actually. :)

On the other hand, if you forward lies and half-truths that hurt other people's reputations, supposedly to defend your faith--remember, you are bearing false witness against your neighbor. "

The Question wrote on Sep 22, 2009 2:13 PM:

" Well put, CrowWoman, although I disagree that attributing a quote to someone who did not make it is fairly benign.
I think it's fairly insidious, distorting the historic record and perverting the nation's intellectual history. If we don't know what historic figures actually thought, we'll have a hard time realistically discussing public issues. But then some people don't want us to have a realistic discussion. "

Honest Citizen wrote on Sep 22, 2009 3:05 PM:

" Verified by a Jefferson Historian @ U of I:
"The beauty of the 2nd Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it away." "

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson

No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson

Dont like those? How about these:

John F. Kennedy, quotes about Arms:
... By calling attention to a well-regulated militia for the security of the Nation, and the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms, our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fear of governmental tyranny, which gave rise to the 2nd amendment, will ever be a major danger to our Nation, the amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic military-civilian relationship, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the 2nd Amendment will always be important.

Abraham Lincoln, quotes about Arms:
Ballots are the rightful, and peaceful, successors of bullets; and that when ballots have fairly, and constitutionally, decided, there can be no successful appeal, back to bullets; that there can be no successful appeal, except to ballots themselves, at succeeding elections.

James Madison, quotes about Arms:
A government that does not trust it's law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust.

Ronald Reagan, quotes about Arms:
The NRA believes America's laws were made to be obeyed and that our Constitutional liberties are just as important today as 200 years ago. And by the way, the Constitution does not say Government shall decree the right to keep and bear arms. The Constitution says 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'

How about one by Samual Adams?
"Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' ... If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were once, our countrymen!"

Or maybe one by George Washington
Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance to the nation; they are liberty's teeth.

There are lots more out there people "

The Question wrote on Sep 22, 2009 4:10 PM:

" A "Jefferson Historian @ U of I" is not a citation. It's an empty fake.
All Jefferson's quotes can be dated and verified in his letters and writings. This can't. The quote is a lie.
The Washington quote is also fake. This quotation, sometimes called the "liberty teeth" quote, appears nowhere in Washington's papers or speeches.
I'm not going to look them all up for you. But putting lies in the mouth of two early presidents doesn't make you honest or much of a citizen, does it? "

~STRANGER~ wrote on Sep 22, 2009 6:54 PM:

" father bob,are there any white people you like? Why should the paper fire Dave? Perhaps if you request he'll turn you on to a great carp fishing hole.You do like carp don't you?
Right on Dave. "

M wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:09 PM:

" CrowWoman & TQ: You are both an embarrassment to decent people. If you actually believe your BS, then I suggest to you that you are totally worthless. "

Jo wrote on Sep 22, 2009 9:40 PM:

" Speaking of control...

How many armed stand-offs have we had in Coles County in the last few months?

Seems like some things are out of control. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 23, 2009 12:28 AM:

" Likestoknow wrote on Sep 21, 2009 7:00 PM:
" Nutjob--You wrote". . . the right that was already given to us by our creator." Would that be the same Creator who said "Thou shalt not kill?" And, many of us have spoken--we just had an election--remember? "


You mean kill as in murder as in a homicide right, that is the true word used. Not trying to start an argument, just making clarification. Justifiable death is permitted in the Scriptures especially the Law. "

CrowWoman wrote on Sep 23, 2009 6:49 AM:

" If you mean by "decent people", M, people like yourself--than I do indeed hope that I am an embarrassment. I'm thinking next time you post something, you may well do a little fact-checking first. So, post away! "

The Question wrote on Sep 23, 2009 7:05 AM:

" Why not cut the nonsense and properly cite the sources for your quotes, M?
Lousy scholarship like yours would get you a failing grade in any university class. "

father bob wrote on Sep 23, 2009 9:32 AM:

" ~STRANGER~ wrote on Sep 22, 2009 6:54 PM:
" father bob,are there any white people you like? Why should the paper fire Dave? Perhaps if you request he'll turn you on to a great carp fishing hole.You do like carp don't you?
Right on Dave. """""


nice reference to the carp!...y'll kno alz us n*****s luv dem der carps.

and yes i do like many white people and i particularly love the white woman i'm married to. "

BW wrote on Sep 23, 2009 10:00 AM:

" TQ, is this a university class? Are you the instructor? What would we do without your ever-tactful comments and grace? "

The Question wrote on Sep 23, 2009 11:38 AM:

" Sorry, BW, but if you're going to participate in a public discussion of issues, I'm afraid you can't just cite lies as evidence for your position, whether through conscious duplicity or sheer, lazy negligence.
Honest people don't function that way, inside or outside the classroom. "

BW wrote on Sep 23, 2009 3:28 PM:

" TQ, when you use the words "you" and "your" when addressing me about citing lies as evidence, I find that somewhat offensive. If such language came from an intelligent person who had an original thought and didn't just cite sources it would be extremely offensive. Of course, regarding you, this is not the case. "

what wrote on Sep 23, 2009 10:56 PM:

" If the second amendment is breached can the first be far behind "

what wrote on Sep 24, 2009 12:32 AM:

" If you take a carp, gut it and pack it in good clayish mud, throw it on the coals for maybe an hour then crack it open the skin comes off with the mud, what's left, less the little mud streak they have, is pure choice goodies. "

jrhendren wrote on Sep 27, 2009 10:04 PM:

" The Question wrote on Sep 23, 2009 11:38 AM:
" Sorry, BW, but if you're going to participate in a public discussion of issues, I'm afraid you can't just cite lies as evidence for your position, whether through conscious duplicity or sheer, lazy negligence.
Honest people don't function that way, inside or outside the classroom. "


What are you talking about? You never cite your sources, why should others have to but you not? "

~STRANGER~ wrote on Sep 29, 2009 7:31 AM:

" What, It's a heck of alot easier to go to the ice house on fridays and get the all you can eat walleye for 6 bucks. "

 


COLUMN: Come one! Come all! Decide for yourself who's a clown and who's not

Gun control mainly about the ‘control’

COLUMN: Walk, relay, fight, pray: just get out there and get busy for all those who can’t

OUR VIEW: Rasmussen long an important contributor

LETTER: Digging for reasons behind old experiment

LETTER: Keep health care plan in people's best interest

LETTER: Cost of living part of constant price hikes

LETTER: Is country going back to days of witch trials?

LETTER: Government control not part of US tradition

LETTER: FutureGen 'experiment' should concern all

LETTER: Health care reform tied to campaign donations

LETTER: Private sector insurance rips off working people

LETTER: Many rivers used word 'Embarras' for logjams

LETTER: Health care system is beyond repair

LETTER: New law said to lower consumer utility bills

LETTER: Add these folks to the health care reform mix

LETTER: Get health care facts from White House site

LETTER: Deceased truly was late for his own funeral

LETTER: Flags should be at
half-mast on Sept. 11


 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content