|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, August 7, 2009 9:56 PM CDT
LETTER: Affordable health care or government control?
LEONIDAS H. MILLER, Mattoon
As one who has used our health care system, I feel gratitude that it is as good as it is. My visits to Sarah Bush have always had good outcomes. As a cancer patient I feel confident in having continued improvement in health, thanks to the skill and compassion of the people at the Cancer Treatment Center of America.
This puts me among the 70 percent who are satisfied with their terms of care. Being under FDA prohibition, the vaccine mentioned by Mrs. Ulfik was not available in the US. She traveled to Germany to obtain it.
With what is happening in Washington, I find myself wondering about the future. Will cancer patients have such good care available to them in the future? At age 71, maybe I am among the last of the lucky.
One of the reasons for the high cost of health care is strictly legal. Pricey trial lawyers are the invisible intruders at the doctor’s office. As protection from them, doctors and others purchase very expensive liability insurance. To control costs, doctors and others, we are told, order many tests to avoid law suits. Insurance companies have deep pockets as the greedy look on. Correct? If we want to imitate other nations, we could enact laws that limit awards in malpractice cases.
Years ago the owners of Forbes Magazine adopted a health care plan for its workers. Forbes funded health savings accounts for its workers, making annual deposits to them. At the same time they provided insurance policies with high deductibles, which reduced the costs of premiums and probably led to far less paper shuffling than we now have.
For all parties involved, this is the best known plan. Some features developed by Gov. Mitt Romney, would improve this business model. (Mitt Romney, USA Today, Jul-30-09, p. 7A) The aim of Forbes and Romney is clear. They arranged affordable health care for people.
What Obama wants is the central planning model of highly controlled health care as part of government totalitarian control. The government would decide more than doctors and patients about health care, using piles of government agencies, providing more barriers to health care than deliveries of it.
The Republicans should stonewall Obama’s plan, insisting that compromise is only a way of surrendering our liberties on the installment plan. Stonewalling would credibly notify voters that there is a different way available to them.
LEONIDAS H. MILLER
Mattoon
Add your comments
Not already registered? Then click Here.
Comment policy:
JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.
In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.
We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.
No comment may contain:
* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.
If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Question wrote on Aug 8, 2009 4:59 AM:
In fact, the health savings account is a scam that benefits only the wealthy, the healthy and the companies that then jettison much of their group health insurance.
John Goodman, president of the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and the so-called "father" of the health savings account, actually had the gall to say: "If a mother wakes up in the middle of the night with a sick child, we want her to think about the cost of the emergency room visit."
That's right. When your child is desperately ill, what you should really have to think about above all else is whether you can afford any medical care, or just have to let your child suffer.
Brilliant, Miller. You're always brilliant. "