Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
18°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:32 PM CDT
LETTER: What sacrifices do the elected officials make?



DAVE KERSEY, Mattoon

Are you one who lost your job this past year? Were you ready to retire, but now worry about the loss in your 401K? Are you forgoing the yearly vacation due to all the uncertainty in the economy? Well, then you have made a major sacrifice to your way of living, but had little choice in the outcome.

But what have our elected officials given up to help our economy? I know of very little, and I surely cannot get any response when writing the state officials or Congress. Why is it no national news reporter ever questions the Congressmen on what sacrifices they have made. No private employee can vote an automatic pay raise every year.

Most private employee pension funds have been eliminated or changed to 401Ks, but our legislature and congress have full-funded, separate pension funds, 100 percent funded and pay-out. Congress has full-funded medical insurance when most of us are paying percentage or full policy insurances.

Congress still gets to travel the world on juntas in the name of furthering their knowledge when they cannot make scheduled hearings or committees or even days of Congress.

Why does Congress need so much expenses for office staff, mailings, etc.? Where are the savings, sacrifices from these elected officers when the poor, unemployed, middle-class continue to do more with less?

This arrogance not only applies to Washington, D.C., but also in Springfield, Illinois.

Next time you see an elected official, attend a town hall meeting, or are approached for your vote, ask the person seeking office or in office, what are they going to sacrifice?

DAVE KERSEY

Mattoon


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


Tom Andres wrote on Jun 4, 2009 1:23 AM:

" Thank you, Dave, for a common sense view. This arrogance you talk about isn't just in Washington and Springfield. It exists at every level of government/government agency.

For example, take a look at the Mattoon City budget for 2009-2010. Depending on the department, you'll see "Salaries and Wages" increasing 8% to 20%, this year compared to last year! Add on the other employment costs, and it gets even worse!

If the City of Mattoon were a private entity, there would be no red ink in the operating budget. Somehow, that projected $800,000 loss would have been gone before the ink dried. Either that, or the management team would have been fired. "

Harry Potter wrote on Jun 4, 2009 6:39 AM:

" Don't worry Tom, they will probably make it up by selling off more assets and land. I would imagine they have some extra lawn mowers not in use. "

Becky wrote on Jun 4, 2009 12:11 PM:

" FYI:

A Lesser-Known Tale of Badgers and Suckers. To begin with, some of the most well-known state symbols allude to lesser-known meanings and histories. I grew up in Wisconsin and only recently learned that the Badger State title originally refers not to Bucky, nor to the savage beast itself, but to lead miners in the 1820s and 30s. These miners moved from prospect to prospect in southwestern Wisconsin, traveling light and often, with little money for luxury. When winter came and conditions worsened, those miners too far from home to migrate would dig themselves sheltering caves in the hills like badgers. These temporary dwellings could be abandoned if a prospect proved fruitless, without much regret; and if the lead pickings were good, the lucky miner could fluff up his badger hole or upgrade to a more traditional Euro-American residence. For this practice Wisconsin miners were dubbed badgers a jibe that was soon appropriated as a proud, statewide nickname. Bucky didnt come along until 1949; the furry, quadruped badger, notoriously vicious when cornered, wasnt declared Wisconsins state animal until 1957.
Other miners migrated south for the winter to the far end of Illinois, much like the regions sucker fish; which earned them the nickname of Suckers, and their state of Illinois its unenviable nickname, The Sucker State.

I guess the term still applies ;) "

Tom Andres wrote on Jun 4, 2009 9:21 PM:

" You know, Harry, something that has always bugged me about government (fund) accounting is the total disregard of the difference between the Balance Sheet and the Statement of Revenue and Expense.

In private concerns, if whatever comes in exceeds whatever goes out, the difference accumulates on the Balance Sheet as Retained Earnings - and all is well with the stockholders.

In public concerns, if whatever comes in exceeds whatever goes out, panic ensues and outrageous spending becomes a mandate - and all is NOT well with the taxpayers! "

Jim1969 wrote on Jun 5, 2009 7:54 AM:

" Dig deep America. Times are tough and we need the money so we can continue to pay ourselves 2 or 3 (or more) times the wages the average person makes and so that we can continue to fund research into important issues such as which brand of ketchup is really the thickest and what type of jokes really make people laugh. We also need to be able to pay millions of dollars for projects to improve private property and give contracts to companies based on how much they contributed to getting us into office. "

Billie Brant wrote on Jun 5, 2009 3:12 PM:

" Oh for the days of Senator William Proxmire and his "Golden Fleece Awards"! He would be hard pressed to keep up with all those who would be "worthy" of one of them! "

Rockin Rotty wrote on Jun 5, 2009 8:47 PM:

" Amen there, Billie! "

M wrote on Jun 7, 2009 7:07 AM:

" Sad but true, Jim1969. "

 

 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content