Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
10°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Monday, May 4, 2009 8:41 PM CDT
OUR VIEW: Modified EIU energy center worth pursuing



Eastern Illinois University’s proposed Renewable Energy Center looks like a workable project.

There is little doubt that EIU needs a new power source.

The current campus coal-burning plant was built in 1925. The plant has been propped up and updated several times.

But it’s time to move into the 21st century.

Judging from the design that was unveiled recently by President Bill Perry, the Renewable Energy Center should serve the campus in an efficient, low-cost manner for years to come.

The energy center would burn wood chips that come as byproducts of the lumber industry.

Now university officials are seeking a change in state law that would allow EIU to borrow the money to build the Renewable Energy Center.

The loan could be paid for from savings that would come from not having to pay for coal any more, and other efficiencies.

The legislation, sponsored by State Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon, was approved by the Illinois Senate by a 50-0 vote. It now moves to the House for further debate.

Understandably, neighbors of the proposed site, at the intersection of Illinois Route 130 and Edgar Drive on the city’s southeast side, had questions about a “power plant” next door when it was announced in late fall.

EIU officials demonstrated an interest in being a good neighbor by making some changes based on area residents’ objections.

Some of the modifications include moving the building 25 feet farther off of Route 130, moving the truck entrance to Edgar Drive, replacing most of the exterior steel with bricks and concrete blocks, and reducing the storage silo height.

Artist drawings of the proposed $40 million energy center showed a building that blends in well with a university campus.

Trucks hauling materials to generate the power will be routed down an access road off of Edgar Drive. He said the exterior will be comprised of glass windows, brick and concrete block, although steel could be used for the south wall to allow for future expansion.

The updated design calls for two 45-foot-tall plant matter silos instead of one 80-foot-tall silo served by an even taller elevator.

Perry said mature trees and other landscaping will screen the center from the residential subdivision just north of the proposed site.

The Renewable Energy Center is an opportunity to invest in the future and to change the way the campus generates its power.

The unanimous state Senate vote is an indication that this is a project worth pursuing.

JG/T-C Editorial Board


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


gringa wrote on May 2, 2009 12:03 AM:

" All well and good, but I'd still like to know why EIU would spend $40-million on old technology when far more efficient and lower cost alternatives exist.

Within two years, a company named Hyperion Power Generation Inc, Santa Fe, NM, will have available very small nuclear non-weapons grade power modules about the size of a back yard shed, capable of providing electricity for a community of 20,000 homes. Total cost: about $25-million. No need to relocate from the present more-central power plant site right on campus.

Come to think of it, EIU could sell that land adjacent to The Fields subdivision and the county would then have that acerage back on the tax rolls.

Yeah, I'm liking this idea more and more. "

EIU Student Rep wrote on May 3, 2009 11:47 AM:

" Let me get this straight. You want a nuclear power plant right in the middle of campus? Really?
And, old technology? Gasification is among the newest techonologies availible to pursue clean energy, and is extraordinarily clean and efficient. You say that they will have this technology in 2 years. We need a new plant now, not 2 years from now, let alone the build time for it.

The entire campus master plan focused moving the plant to the periphery of campus from where it is so that large trucks aren't tearing through the middle of campus, creating a safety hazard. The eventual plan is to gut the existing steam plant structure, and remodel it and create a one-stop shop for student services, freeing up valuable space across campus, hopefully diffusing the need for other new buildings in the foreseeable future.

However, with that being said, Eastern is smack dab in the middle of Charleston. If it is to continue to grow and be attractive to new students, we need more space, which is why that land was bought in the first place. Giving up that land would greatly handcuff Eastern in the future if more space were needed. While I certainly agree that having that land off the tax rolls while it isn't being used is not extremely desirable, but it is vital to make sure that Eastern has space to expand long into the future. Unless, that is, you want to have a situation like we had before Doudna was completed where students are being ferried all over Charleston to go to their classes.

I should also note that a new building is being constructed because the time and money that would be spent trying to renovate the current plant while still keeping it in service for heating, cooling, hot water, and cooking power for the entire campus is simply not economically feasible. "

gringa wrote on May 4, 2009 9:28 AM:

" EIU Student Rep wrote: "Let me get this straight. You want a nuclear power plant right in the middle of campus? Really?"

Yes, Student Rep, you must be on the Dean's List! Good comprehension skills. A nuclear power module, right in the middle of campus. Or ... we can burn wood chips, off campus - which I guess is your idea of high tech? Gasification is just a new twist on extremely old technology. If you really want clean energy, go nuc! Have you considered what happens when sufficient by-product wood chips are no longer available? If you insist on old tech power sources from old tech supply lines, just burn coal.

Actually, the self-contained nuclear module is available right now (at a far more affordable cost) but, yes, it would take about two years to deliver it. Did you even do a search for Hyperion Power? How long do you think it will take to build the wood burner, Miss-Ants-in-Your-Pants? Get a grip on the limits of your intellect. I have a feeling it'll come in handy for you in the very near future.

Did it ever occur to you that large trucks tearing through the middle of a residential neighborhood is just as objectionable as large trucks tearing through the middle of campus?

Your presumption of Eastern's continued growth (I call it sprawl) implies an entitlement to eminent domain. That's a fairly powerful, and offensive, argument on your part. Better read up on property ownership rights of the private citizen. You want a larger campus? Build up (as in vertical).

I hope youre not graduating anytime soon, my friend. You still have a whole lot to learn. "

Jim1969 wrote on May 4, 2009 6:57 PM:

" And people, especially those around EIU, are whining now. How much louder do you think they will whine if someone seriously proposed placing a nuclear energy plant of any kind in their back yards.

I am not an electrical engineer by any imagination, but one thing I have never understood is why an electrical power plant can not be self sustaining. Why can't some of the electricity produced be siphoned off the system, on site, to power electric motors to spin the generators that produce the power. "

gringa wrote on May 5, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Of course, you're right, Jim1969. With these folks it's the "not-in-my-back-yard" mentality. Kind of goes along with the "Support the troops. End the war" theme. Both schools of thought require a head-in-the-sand way of thinking. Most of them live in an extremely sheltered academic environment. They're also the ones who think we should pay more taxes, but Ive never heard of them sending an extra check to the IRS.

By the way, this compact underground, concrete-encased nuclear module is capable of providing power to 20,000 households (thats households, not individuals). That's big enough for the whole EIU campus plus the city of Charleston. Instead, we're gonna burn wood chips - kind of like they do in Nigeria. Lets hear it for EIU. Welcome EIU to the 21st century.

As to your other point, it's called a perpetual motion system. LOL. God managed to do it, but even Einstein couldnt figure out how to duplicate it. "

Mike P wrote on May 5, 2009 2:03 PM:

" Some day that may be an option, but I think the current laws of physics and available technology, are what still defines energy output from energy input. Superconductors may eventually help to bridge the gaps more, but only needing fuel or other means of stored energy to start up the generator, and then it being able to produce a net gain in output is still a long ways off.

EIU should be looking at incorperating some geothermal in its upgrades. LLC should as well. EIU is only opting to update their generation system, and route it through the likely just as old radiators and other systems.

They should have looked at a land swap or purchase south of town. With room for solar, or wind generators, to supliment their options. Many of their buildings should get solar panels on the roof. If they were remotely worried about future expansion, they would not be tying up this space with a power plant. If they produced more energy than they use, it could be sold into the power grid. Any updates should have looked at more, and if it were in a field south of town, or other off campus location, the additional expense of aesthetics would be moot.

Several smaller storage towers are often better than one big one. Each needs its own feed system, so the whole thing isn't down from one part or mechanism having issues or failure. Some of their proposal has its merits, but much of it lacks any vision or basic knowledge in effectively planning for the future. Deffinately not what you should expect from a higher learning institution. "

Becky wrote on May 5, 2009 2:22 PM:

" Jim asks: "I am not an electrical engineer by any imagination, but one thing I have never understood is why an electrical power plant can not be self sustaining. Why can't some of the electricity produced be siphoned off the system, on site, to power electric motors to spin the generators that produce the power. "

I have asked the same thing over and over and I've never gotten an answer. You could add a perpetual motion motor to the equation and very little energy would go into running the motors. So, EIU grads, why wouldn't this idea work? "

Tom Andres wrote on May 5, 2009 10:16 PM:

" ////Mike P: EIU should be looking at incorperating some geothermal in its upgrades. LLC should as well.////

Mike, I believe Lakeland did the geothermal thing over a year ago. "

Raider65 wrote on May 6, 2009 2:22 AM:

" Becky, Would you let me know where I could purchase a perpetual motion motor? It would make a nice addition to my wind/solar car on days when it's cloudy and the wind isn't blowing. "

Becky wrote on May 6, 2009 7:33 AM:

" Granger:
Perpetual motion motors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQAo3O2d8cU

and: http://sgenergycrisis.blogspot.com/2007/09/overunity-perpetual-motion-motor.html

Maybe you should google for info before trying to make someone look foolish and ending up with egg on your own face. "

Mike P wrote on May 6, 2009 3:14 PM:

" Last year I read about a company being the first to do geothermal on a large enough scale to be used in an apartment complex. I think it was around Decatur. "

bigapple wrote on May 6, 2009 3:35 PM:

" Perpetual Motion Motors? Lol. There is no such thing as a true perpetual motion motor because according to the law of thermodynamics perpetual motion is not possible. Anything you come across in a google search that claims to be a perpetual motion or free energy device is a scam, ripoff or hoax. Throughout history thousands of inventors have claimed to have created perpetual motion machines but none of their creations were ever proven to work. "

Michael wrote on May 7, 2009 7:08 AM:

" As in the other article, the cap and trade tax proposed by the white house would make this project more costly to run and nearly as harmful to the environment due to CO2 emissions. Something to check out! "

Jim1969 wrote on May 7, 2009 6:19 PM:

" 20 years ago my self sustaining power plant theory may not have been possible due to the materials we had to work with, but with the current alloys and ceramics available things may have and probably changed a great deal.

I think the only real "if" factor in something like this is if an electric motor could be built that would run long enough before needing rebuilt. Other than that I have a strong hunch that it is nothing more than the oil companies being a little too powerful. "

The Curious wrote on May 8, 2009 9:03 PM:

" What is the matter with using windmills?

They store up energy in the batteries for use when there is no wind.

Why aren't we going for that which is the new technology proven to work in other countries and in the US also? "

Raptor wrote on May 9, 2009 8:55 AM:

" I'm with Gringa on the nuke plant.

U of I has had one on campus for 30 years +/-. It has been used as a training tool. The technology has improved much since then.

EIU Student Rep is just a party line mouth piece for Dale Righter and the establishment. A good kid and easily pliable.

Folks are going to whine regardless of whether we get a nuke or wood chip plant. Don't use Illinois coal. It's to close and available in abundance. "

 


OUR VIEW: Tuition hike an unwelcome spring tradition

COLUMN: Waterboarding or your next boring staff meeting at work: You choose

Quinn should revive Boys, Girls State tradition

COLUMN: 'Stay-cation' doesn't have to mean sitting at home bored

OUR VIEW: Modified EIU energy center worth pursuing

LETTER: Social Security cut, tax increase to hurt many

LETTER: Be concerned, vote, be happy for freedoms

LETTER: Military actions don't belong in the news

LETTER: Camp New Hope plans day program for adults

LETTER: 'Employee Free Choice' does not end elections

LETTER: 'Scaring someone' is not the same as torture

LETTER: Bible does discuss marriage, homosexuality

LETTER: Research reveals Bible addresses the issues

LETTER: Grandkids won't know what they will be missing

LETTER: Committee seeks a cleaner Casey

LETTER: Time for US to live up to torture agreement

LETTER: Society cooling to global warming concerns

LETTER: CHS musical is a bit of Broadway on Lincoln Ave.

LETTER: Military actions don't belong on newscasts

LETTER: God's attitude shown in destroying two cities

LETTER: Quinn should declare a financial emergency


 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content