Friday, March 27, 2009 9:30 PM CDT
City candidates speak up about coming down on eyesore places
By HERB MEEKER, Staff Writer hmeeker@jg-tc.com
MATTOON — City Council candidate George “Butch” Gullion is not surprised by what happened on Western Avenue this week.
An attic fire in an empty apartment building at 2215 Western Ave. forced firefighters off the roof. It was one of several fire calls there over the years. In fact, Gullion, a retired Mattoon Public Works employee, recalls a problem with the property’s basement, demonstrating how long the property has been a headache for City Hall.
And Gullion is not shocked city officials claim they will crack down on the property owner this time to either fix up or tear down the eyesore. He said that is an empty promise he is tired of hearing.
“This has been brought up before. Why hasn’t it been addressed?” said Gullion, who presented complaints to the City Council last month on about two dozen rotting and eyesore properties in town.
His list shows the problem is widespread and the city is years behind — the former apartment house on Western Avenue has been facing complaints for a quarter of a century —on solving the issue.
“Go after the people who own it! The city is dropping the ball on this. They are just passing the buck,” Gullion said. “I could take down one burned-out house on Moultrie with a backhoe. Why don’t they do something about that?”
All city council candidates have offered an opinion on eliminating dilapidated or condemned properties in the city. Some note the legal entanglements, while others think the issue should be on the front burner at Mattoon City Hall.
“It costs $8,000 to $10,000 for the city to tear down one of these houses,” said Rick Hall, incumbent candidate for council. “And the law favors the homeowners.”
He added these abandoned structures exist in good neighborhoods. That frustrates homeowners dedicated to maintaining their homes. He believes something needs to be done, but it would be hard with such a tight city budget now.
“You have people building fences so they don’t have to look at these properties,” Hall said during the candidate forum this week.
Randy Ervin agrees the legal process does present roadblocks for securing condemnation of properties now.
“The bottom line is some of the deadbeat property owners are able to play the system. They do enough to patch it up and that satisfies a judge. We need to pass new ordinances with teeth,” said Ervin, also an incumbent candidate.
Candidate Bill Jones agrees more aggressive tactics are needed to attack the problem.
“We need new rules in town. The firemen could have been burned up in that fire the other night. If you don’t push the issue the owners aren’t going to do anything,” Jones said.
Chris Rankin and Bob Becker said some structures are being torn down but at too slow a rate.
“Looking at the rate of houses becoming dilapidated it will stay above what is being torn down,” Becker said during Wednesday’s forum.
He called for more creative techniques to close that gap.
Rankin called for more aggressive action through the legal process and issuing citations on code violations.
Dr. Kelly Helms noted the problem might increase due to the fact the city nuisance officer has taken another job. With the current city budget problems, it is doubtful that vacancy will be filled. Already, those duties have fallen on the Code Enforcement Department, which is trying to keep up.
“This is going to be a tough problem and we’re trying to find out who is going to pick up the slack,” Helms said.
Ray Hamilton hinted at a double standard on city government’s part relating to problem properties.
“Right now, we have some city buildings that need fixed up,” he said.
Tim Gover said the issue does not just concern residential properties.
“One example is the old Young Radiator property. But the problem is there are not only legal procedures you have to follow but sometimes it is hard to determine the legal owner. Stricter enforcement and new ordinances might be one way to handle this,” said Gover.
Mike Colvis said he would be willing contact nuisance property owners one-on-one to help solve the problem. But he admits whatever approach is taken will not be easy.
“It is going to be a slow process and there will be a lot of red tape. We do have a beautiful city here. And taking care of this will make Mattoon safer and more pleasant,” he said.
Contact Herb Meeker at hmeeker@jg-tc.com or 238-6869.
Add your comments
Not already registered? Then click Here.
Comment policy:
JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.
In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.
We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.
No comment may contain:
* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.
If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
|
|
|
|
|
medic57 wrote on Mar 28, 2009 12:35 PM:
For the same reasons it won't be addressed if you're elected. It's just something to talk about to get elected and nothing will happen after you, or anyone else is elected.
Sooo, you presented complaints to the city last month, how about the 30 plus years you worked for the city. "