Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
12°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Friday, February 27, 2009 10:40 PM CST
COLUMN: Oscars this year missed some of the big hits



Last weekend I continued my annual tradition of watching the Academy Awards, but I was only interested in the first hour or so of the telecast.

I tuned in long enough to see how Hugh Jackson fared as host, liked his song and dance numbers, but the show had too many film montages. I also tuned in to see Heath Ledger win a posthumous supporting actor Oscar for his gleefully anarchic performance as the Joker in “The Dark Knight.”

The reason I was not interested in the rest of the Academy Awards show is that I feel “The Dark Knight” otherwise was snubbed, and so was Clint Eastwood’s “Gran Torino.”

Neither film received nominations for best picture or director. With the exception of Ledger’s nomination, neither film garnered any other acting nominations. “The Dark Knight” and “Gran Torino” were two of my favorite films of 2008, and I believe they are both very Oscar worthy.

“The Dark Knight,” a follow-up to 2005’s “Batman Begins,” struck a chord with American and Canadian movie-goers to the tune of more than $530 million, making it one of the most successful movies ever at the box office.

Audiences have no doubt been attracted to “The Dark Knight” by its thrilling action scenes, which include a deviously well-plotted bank robbery and an explosive car chase through Gotham. The film also seems to connect with viewers at a deeper level than just delivering great stunt work.

Ledger is brilliant as the villainous Joker, but the rest of the acting ensemble delivers heartfelt performances. This includes Christian Bale as a brooding Batman, Aaron Eckhart as the tragic Harvey Dent/Two-Face, and Gary Oldman as honest police officer James Gordon.

“The Dark Knight” also raises thought-provoking questions about the fine line between order and chaos, how people would respond to life and death situations, and how a noble deception might be better than a demoralizing truth.

While “The Dark Knight” deserved the best picture Oscar, I would have been happy if it just had been nominated.

The best picture slate for the recent Academy Awards show included “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” “Frost/Nixon,” “Milk,” “The Reader,” and “Slumdog Millionaire,” which won the top award.

I have not seen any of the best picture nominees, so I cannot vouch for their quality. I do think that with the possible exception of “Slumdog Millionaire,” which has become a surprise hit, none of the nominees will likely be as well remembered years from now as “The Dark Knight.”

Regarding “Gran Torino,” the film’s best shot at an Oscar nomination was probably for the lead acting of star and director Clint Eastwood.

Eastwood portrays cantankerous widower Walk Kowalski. The retired auto worker and Korean War veteran overcomes his bigotry as he bonds with his Hmong immigrant neighbors from Southeast Asia and realizes he has more in common with them than his own materialistic offspring.

Kowalski tries with his fists and guns to protect the family from a Hmong street gang in their Michigan neighborhood, but comes to realize violence on his part might not be the answer to their problems.

Eastwood’s rich performance is enhanced by what viewers know about his history in film. Here is an actor who built his early career on violent Westerns and action movies. “Gran Torino” pays homage to Eastwood’s tough guy image while showing that even an old tough guy can change for the better.

“Gran Torino” has done surprisingly well with audiences, earning more than $130 million so far. Box office results should not be a deciding factor for Oscar nominations. Still it would nice to see more films, like “Gran Torino,” that are both commercially and critically well received, earn nominations.

The lead actor category at the Oscars always seems to be one of the most crowded in terms of the talented actors who were nominated and the many who were not. Sean Penn won for “Milk” after facing tough competition from Frank Langella for “Frost/Nixon,” and Mickey Rourke for “The Wrestler.”

I can see how Eastwood got crowded out, but I still wish they would have made room for him. Eastwood has won best director Oscars for “Unforgiven” and “Million Dollar Baby,” but has never won an acting Oscar.

A best leading actor Oscar for “Gran Torino” would have been a fitting and well-earned way for Eastwood, 78, to cap his long career.


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


Locke wrote on Feb 28, 2009 3:12 PM:

" If one says, "I have not seen any of the best picture nominees, so I cannot vouch for their quality", then honestly, how can one state, "Oscars this year missed some of the big hits."

I have seen all the movies, and I agree, Eastwood Gran Torino got snubbed badly. The Wrestler had some of the most unlikable characters ever seen on screen, and Benji Button was a pale Green Mile where you knew the ending.

I don't agree with Dark Knight. It was a superhero movie. You are either into it or you are not. It tells us nothing new, it has no exceptional moments, with the possible exception of Ledger. Even then, I would wager to say had he not died, there would not have been a consideration. If anything, the makeup team should have garnered an Oscar -- but they don't always bother showing award that on TV.

I guess after the No Country for Old Men joke of an award, I don't bother with the awards. "

medic57 wrote on Feb 28, 2009 7:23 PM:

" Give me a break Rob, The Dark Knight struck a cord because one of the actors in the movies decided to mix about 5 different painkillers and Anti-Depressents at the same time. He didn't even finish making the movie because of his drug problem, and what does America do? Enshrine him. As far as the Joker goes, NO ONE was better than Jack.


I do think that with the possible exception of Slumdog Millionaire, which has become a surprise hit, none of the nominees will likely be as well remembered years from now as The Dark Knight.


It will only be remembered for one reason, because poor ole Heath Ledger couldn't handle making a few million dollars and decided to spend some of it on Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Diazepam, Temazepam, Alprazolam, and Doxylamine.

Look those medicines up, 2 heavy painkillers, 2 sleeping pills, 1 Anti-Phsychotic and Xanax. All of this medicine for a man worth millions, with a beautiful girlfriend and daughter. How many lives did he ruin because he was stupid and selfish? "

Clementine wrote on Mar 2, 2009 4:27 PM:

" I'm sorry, we all make mistakes and typos (although we don't all have editors) but it amused me to no end when you said you 'tuned in long enough to see how Hugh Jackson fared as host....'

Apparently he didn't fare too well or you might have realized his name is Hugh Jackman!

I will agree on two points, while I didn't care all that much for The Dark Knight, unlike you I found the chaos of the movie unrelentingly tiresome after a while and the only question it really provoked in me was, 'dear heaven, when will this movie end?'. But I agree Heath Ledger did a magnificent job as The Joker. And I might even agree Christian Bale may have deserved the Academy Award for Best Actor, after all it does appear that portraying an honorable, selfless superhero is a phenomenal piece of acting for him. (Maybe the next villain to hit Gotham City could be an evil cinematographer....)

Oh, Rob, just giving you a hard time. Now about Walk Kowalski. :) "

NeoCon Academician wrote on Mar 2, 2009 4:43 PM:

" WHO...CARES?

Who wants to see a bunch of selfish, spoiled, irresponsible, rich, Hollywood movie stars decked out in their million dollar dresses, tuxedos, and jewelry giving awards to themselves?

Don't they know there are millions of people in this country out of jobs, yet they are okay with flaunting their opulence?! Must be great living the good life....

What an outrage!

Hey Hollywood movie stars...impress us common folk...give your money to the jobless folks in this country!

They won't.

But that's okay...it'll be funny when Bollywood starts producing better, more affordable entertainment than Hollywood does.... and just like with what happened with the American automobile industry...

Oops! Guess that's already started with the "Slumdog Millionaire" film.

Will you Hollywood movie types want your hand-outs too then when that happens.....? "

jd50 wrote on Mar 2, 2009 8:26 PM:

" Siskel&Ebert,wannabees HO-hum "

Harry Potter wrote on Mar 6, 2009 7:52 AM:

" Seriously NeoCon, is there anyone you don't hate. You seem to be a very unhappy person. "

 


COLUMN: 'Rules' is one 'R' word that is worth reading by all ages

COLUMN: Oscars this year missed some of the big hits

COLUMN: You say 'shortcut,' and I say 'efficient' -- and so does Isa

OUR VIEW: Two honorees contribute in different ways

OUR VIEW: Which council vote is the one that counts?

OUR VIEW: So many will miss Mary Jane Coartney's 'brief embrace'

LETTER: Time for action to enhance city's future

LETTER: 'Gun-grabbers' flying in from across the country

LETTER: Ammunition may be next on anti-gun list

LETTER: Republicans had chance to accept compromises

LETTER: Network loses a viewer after awards broadcast

LETTER: 'Honor among thieves' is a lesson learned

LETTER: Yelks humbled but want drill team at nationals

LETTER: Community gardens, food drives needed

LETTER: Ringuette, Weber deserve EIU posts


 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content