Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
79°F
If you could add a contest to Bagelfest what would it be?
More
Bagel toss
Bagel eating
Bagel stacking
Bagel recipes
Bagel crafts
View Results
 


















 
Monday, November 3, 2008 9:18 PM CST
LETTER: One 'negative instance' is out of proportion



On March 9, 1832, Lincoln said, “Every man is said to have his peculiar ambition. I can say for one that I have no other so great as that of being truly esteemed of my fellow men...”

Lincoln was held in high esteem by those of us who labored to make the Lincoln-Douglas Debate Museum a reality. On Oct. 29, a new historical marker was unveiled at the Museum which may sully some positive opinions of Lincoln. The text on the marker “qualifies” Lincoln’s position on the relationship between negroes and whites. By definition “qualification” may point to either a strength or a weakness.

Lincoln began the debate at Charleston on Sept. 18, 1858, by answering a question about whether he was in favor of producing a perfect equality between negroes and white people. He affirmed that he was not in favor of a “social and political” equality, but his comments did not favor slavery.

Please remember that a speech is an agency of its time. At that time Lincoln was saying what he believed, and what most of the people in his audience believed. He was presenting a generally accepted argument.

In 1994, I was honored to be Lincoln for the C-Span re-enactment of the 1858 debate at Charleston. I memorized most of my part of the three-hour debate. I must admit that I felt uncomfortable delivering the first five minutes of that debate because basic beliefs about the hierarchy and structure of society had changed since 1858. From his remarks about “social and political” equality I knew that some modern minds would make the leap to the conclusion that Lincoln was a racist who believed in slavery.

By the end of the Civil War Lincoln had changed his mind about some of his “social and political” reservations expressed in 1858, but he never wavered in his opposition to slavery. During the seven major debates, of three hours each, he quoted the Declaration of Independence insisting that the negro was entitled to all the unalienable rights. For several years I taught the Lincoln Senior Seminar at Eastern Illinois University. My students and I failed to find any speech by Lincoln that supported slavery.

The comments about “social and political” equality made by Lincoln on Sept. 18, 1858, should be regarded as a second of time in an eternity of debate.

In regard to the new historical marker at the Lincoln-Douglas Debate Museum, I make this final observation: The negative instance carries a positive force out of all proportion to its numerical value.

B.F. McCLERREN

Charleston

 


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


shumphreys wrote on Nov 4, 2008 2:47 PM:

" After voting I stopped by the debate museum to read the new sign. The full explanation of the debate is the first part and is great. Sets the time, the place, the sequence, no judgments just the facts. There is not getting around it, the last paragraph,the word "qualify" is a judgmental, editorial comment and has no business appearing on the sign. "

Locke wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:43 AM:

" Lincoln deserves his place in the history books -- he was the most influential and profound President. He deserves his place as the greatest President for preserving the Union.

This is an old arguement that Lincoln might not have always been anti-slavery. In the end, Lincoln did bring about a dramatic change in our country. Unfortunately, most Americans are ignorant of the change he brought about.

Lincoln offered a trade-off. He initiated a greatly needed social change in American society, but in doing so, he moved the country very far from it's origin. That, not the war, is why American history is divided at the Civil War.

See, as our Founding Fathers desired, the Federal government was subordinate, or at most equal, to the individual states that represented their populations. Remember, a teenager in 1860 listened to his elders who remembered the Revolution -- although they were few and very old, the stories of colonial times and splitting from England were well remembered. In that context, it was natural for the states to believe they had the right to leave the Union.

But this is much more than a justification of succession on the grounds of states rights. It is all about the relationship of the federal/national government and the people. In political circles this is known as Lockean (hence my monkier) and Hobbesian ideology.

Our Founding Fathers believed in a Lockean government where the people had the ultimate authority over the government -- this included the exlicate right to revolution. Lincoln brought about a Hobbesian government where the people were destined to hope for the good will of their government. Elected or not, the people could not use coercian or threat of dissolution, as was done in 1776, in the post-Lincoln era.

Thus we can thank Lincoln for the transition for creating the national government and discarding the federal government.

While Lincoln accomplished many things, foremost preserving the Union and laying the groundwork for equal rights, Lincoln also oversaw the largest increase (or more aptly the creation of) the national government. It was a trade-off. Suspending civil liberties, spying on citizens, illegal detention, unbalanced budgets, and waging unpopular wars are not new problems -- these were all things Lincoln initiated.

The results of his actions were, overall, positive, and hence his place as our greatest president, but there were problems -- the least of which was his historical position on slavery. The real problems have been forgotten by the average American in their ignorance of the political philosophy of our Founding Fathers, despite the average American's zealous reverance of all things related to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. "

 


©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us