|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, October 17, 2008 9:27 PM CDT
OUR VIEW: Readers have their say in JG/T-C online survey
By the JG/T-C Editorial Board editorial@jg-tc.com
This summer, the Journal Gazette and Times-Courier conducted a reader research survey online. A couple hundred area residents completed the survey, and the results showed us some interesting, and sometimes surprising, information about your hometown daily newspaper and the East Central Illinois region it covers.
Here are some highlights from the survey:
- About 97 percent of those participating in the survey said they had read the Journal Gazette/Times-Courier in the past week.
- The most popular sections of the JG/T-C were local news, obituaries, community, lifestyle, the JG/T-C Sunday section, the advertising and the comics.
- Eighty percent said they read the JG/T-C Shopper in the past month.
- About two-thirds said they read the JG/T-C online edition at www.jg-tc.com; almost half do so on a daily basis.
- About 75 percent say they spend up to $200 a month dining in restaurants, and up to $200 a month on fast food.
-About 75 percent spend up to $500 groceries for their household in a typical month.
- The average amount spent each month on a home/apartment rent or mortgage payment was $582.
-The average household income among those surveyed was $58,810.
- About two-thirds have lived in the local area for at least 16 years.
In other words, residents in the JG/T-C readership area tend to stay here, and that’s good news. But one of the most shocking statistics gathered was this one: those surveyed spend 46 cents of their household shopping dollar outside the Mattoon and Charleston area.
That means many area residents travel out of town — whether to Champaign or Effingham or Terre Haute — to do their family and household shopping.
We encourage local residents to shop and dine at home first, whenever possible. You might be surprised at what you could find at a local store or specialty shop.
You just might save yourself some money by finding a deal locally — and just think what you could save in gas by not traveling out of town to buy it!
We bet there is a local store or restaurant that you’ve always intended to check out, but you’ve just never found the time. Well, now is the time.
The next time you and your family prepare to hop in the car and drive out of town to shop or eat, consider what you may find right outside your door.
Likewise, we hope you continue to find value in your daily hometown newspaper — the JG-T/C. Pick up a copy of the paper or visit the Web site to find out local businesses’ advertised deals, and to learn what is going on in your neighborhood.
— JG/T-C Editorial Board
Add your comments
Not already registered? Then click Here.
Comment policy:
JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.
In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.
We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.
No comment may contain:
* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.
If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike P wrote on Oct 18, 2008 12:33 PM:
While this view, fails to list a figure of individual participants, in its reporting of valuing percentages of figures, I think from my exposures the rent is average to slightly high, and 58,810, is high for local average household incomes. I know many families here live on less than 35k a year. Several cope with much less.
While these numbers as provided do actually mean little, the supported idea that folks shop out of town, I will concede.
This is what TIF does to communities. We are at or close to a tipping point of resident retention. We have two colleges in our area. Focusing on retail and hotels or restaurants, in tax payer funded economic development initiatives, is providing opportunities for low wage jobs, and a few more places to eat or sleep. It is a stagnant market for those things. Established business are competing for local dollars, with new publicly funded developments, creating an uneven playing field, and still barely maintaining the exact same markets we had before this became this cities development plan in full. We are not a retail mecca that folks won't mind extra kicker sales taxes, or a 1 percent business district shopping tariff. Unless industry is backing retail up, in a several jobs for one ratio, over developed retail business is doomed to fail. Its basic economic principles.
Misguided development plans, have placed this area on the precipice of failure. We are close to being on the verge of folks being forced to migrate elsewhere to find jobs, better ones, or just to get out from under all these local taxes. We are a very few job cuts from necessity out weighing nostalgia. Many residents have multi generational local ties. Events like are going on at lake paradise, city parks, sidewalks, leaf collection and streets, being mismanaged or completely ignored, contribute to pushing folks away, and keeping them from landing here in the first place.
Focus has to shift immediately, and TIF, and 10M bonds, need halted. It is and has been the wrong direction, and this area needs to focus on its prior commitments and responsibilities, and get them properly managed, long before it proposes to take on new ones, and creates more taxpayer responsibility of any kind in the process.
The mall had water issues, less than 10 years after it was opened. They had a tidal wave in the front paking lot back in the early eighties. It was poorly designed, and poorly planned. They should have sought relief from the developers back then, not looked to taxpayers and the city, to fix a poor assessment of structures issue.
The south east corner of town, was built in a mostly backfilled flood plane. Relators should be required to divulge that information and any site specific known issues. A ditch and pond, will move some water, but is now the best time to spend millions to guess if it will do enough overall, to completely properly drain the flooding areas in a deluge?
Basements now flood all over town, because of poor planning by the city, and storm sewers not being capable of keeping up with moving proper amounts of water. Residents are told the city is not liable or responsible for damage, or even the water backing up. This happens in places that used to be dry, but city development has been poorly designed, infrastructure is not up to the new demands, and residents are required to solve the issues on their own. Its on the other side of town, from the south east corner that has flooded since it was built in a back filled flood plane. Why should old pre existing issues, be handled before more newly developed ones are? Why should the entire city, pay for a ditch and pond, moving some water from one section of town?
Develop a neighborhood association for that area, affected by the flooding, and use grants and their tax money to fix their problems. Probably requiring an area specific tax hike, until it is paid off. Like the proposal Wortman mentioned this spring, if some people wanted their streets paved, instead of rock chip or oil slag, they could pay more on their property taxes as a neighborhood, and get it done. I am sure residents expect results. The entire town is in that same boat. A ditch and pond alone, is not going to solve the big picture problem. If an engineering firm is saying it will, they have little knowledge of water management and hydrology issues. If they will guarantee their results, to specifically defined broad areas, of that part of town, I would say bind them to it, and move on the issue, when the city is in a better position to make this kind of investment, and has sustainable growth occurring in and out of TIF zones.
Now is not the time to guess on large city wide investments, on anything. Use the land that was way over paid for, for industrial development. Taking farm land, and turning it into a retention pond, should have been an at cost acquisition, using imminent domain if necessary and proven guaranteed results could be obtained from this project.
Tax money is not a blank check, it never should have been in the first place. This kind of attitude, is why this area is on the precipice of failure. Local leaders led this area to the edge, and have no idea what went wrong. TIF and bumps in sales taxes taxes were sold to solve everything in some presentation. They bought the lines and ran with the new game plan ball. Look at the studies on TIF's actual effects on growth use and economies.
Google Illinois TIF tax payer, several of them are right there to look through. Some I found predate TIF coming to Mattoon. Evidently the whole picture was not looked at, on a pro and con basis, when this city added TIF to their economic development tool shed, and threw most of the tried and true development tools out or just continually ignore them now.
Look at the Charleston square, it is near the end of its TIF life span. Tell me what sustainable gains have come of it, benefitting the city for sequestering increased property tax funds and funneling them to the district. for 20 some years worth of mostly doing routine maintenance on existing structures. It was not thriving, when Mattoon jumped into the same game. It has failed to accomplish the key to sustainable development and growth. A cornerstone business that is a wide ranging draw has to lead this type of development. further development moves to the increased market, and they compliment each other, in the existing market available.
Simply funding any and all development by sequestering property tax money and offering other incentives, does not work. Build it and they will come, only works in the field of dreams movie. Mattoon wants to be heavily involved in sponsoring funding for a convention center and other sit eat sleep and shop development in a perfectly good corn field. This misguided involvement and its developers is what brought the TIF blight to our town in the first place.
While folks are shopping out of town, they might pick up a local paper. Look for a better job, a responsible city to live in in proximity to that job, and eventually a house. If this town were in a position to offer jobs, a city responsibly doing its required and expected functions, and housing with good streets, sidewalks and parks, in every neighborhood of town, it would be on the receiving end of these migrations, rather than facing the reality of being on the losing end of them, as a direct result of their continual misguided efforts and inability to function or even simply do their assigned jobs. "