" Sorry Bill, but there are too many ethics clouds surrounding your guy. Too many unanswered questions. He has never come clean over the boat issue. But I'm sure his multi screen-name opponent will enlighten us on that issue. How about it Todd/Grad, any thoughts on the boat ownership caper? "

" I might vote for Komada. If he's running for dog catcher I would. For anything else, no way. "

" HP, please, if you can't back it up, don't bring it up. The baseless (and anonymous) accusations you and Early Bird make regarding Judge Komada only serve to reduce your credibility. "

" Still haven't seen anything about the beating that took place the other night. One of the men that are accused was just released from prison and is on parole. He should be locked up,but was released on bond. What do you think of that, Harry? "

" Lets see a judge is FORCED to retire and you think there is nothing about it??? "

" Tom, there you go again. Need I remind you that you are not the monitor? "

" Yeah, I'll never foget the look on his face when he walked into his chambers and I was crowched down behind the door working on his computer. I thought he was going to shoot me.

He left office because Waller was to soft on criminals, we need him back. "

" well even as a democrat steve ferguson isn't getting my vote so somebody better convince me of one of them, ed schniers will never get my vote either, i've gotten a first hand taste about how he feels about his fellow citizens and it is childish and disrespectful, next time you run for office ed don't bad mouth the other party in public "

" 4. He has a record of being fair but firm when prosecuting criminals.???

August 12, 1999
Jimmy S. Derixson, 22, 2008 Champaign Ave., pleaded guilty to reduced charges of aggravated criminal sexual abuse alleging he fondled a girl and had her and a boy fondle one another on May 2. At that time, the girl was 5 years old, and the boy was 4 years old.

The original charges were counts of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child that accused Derixson of engaging in intercourse with the girl and forcing her and the boy into intercourse as well.

A conviction of those offenses would have required a prison sentence of six to 30 years.
Reduced charges and was given 5 yrs prison...

Komada handed out this sentence.
Neither Fair nor Firm!!!

Time For A Change! "

" injustice 85 YOU MUST BE A NICHOLS LOVER I TAKE IT ! Baseless comments will get you nowhere grow up "

" Journal Gazette (Mattoon, IL)


September 3, 1999
Section: News



Charleston man sentenced for sexual assault. Sex offenders
Dave Fopay


CHARLESTON -- A Charleston man was sentenced on Monday to the maximum term of probation, four years, for the sexual assault charge to which he pleaded guilty in June.

Alonzo Clinton Reed, 48, whose last known address was on Division Street, must participate in a sex offenders program through the Coles County Mental Health Center, in addition to other counseling.

Reed pleaded guilty to a charge of criminal sexual assault that accused him of engaging in sex acts with a girl between December and April. Court documents said he admitted fondling the girl and having her fondle him.

There was no agreement on a sentence at the time Reed pleaded guilty. However, at Monday's hearing, State's Attorney Steve Ferguson and Public Defender Lonnie Lutz agreed on the probation term because of the findings of a presentence investigation.

Circuit Judge Paul Komada accepted the sentence, noting that the probation officer who conducted the investigation concluded that Reed's likelihood of successfully completing probation was "fair."

Ferguson added that the county mental health center evaluated Reed after he pleaded guilty and found him to be a good candidate for its treatment program.

Reed could have received a prison sentence of four to 15 years for the conviction "

" Steve Ferguson and Paul Komada are not protecting our children!!! "

" Lets talk about the BOAT deal !!!!! "

" Docket No. 80341--Agenda 4--March 1997.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. GORDON "RANDY"
STEIDL, Appellant.
Opinion filed September 18, 1997.



I believe that defendant did make a substantial showing that his constitutional rights were violated. Most significant is defendant's charge that he was denied due process by the trial judge's (Komada) refusal to recuse himself from the case. Due process requires a judge to recuse himself or herself where actual bias exists (People v. Hall, 157 Ill. 2d 324, 332 (1993)) or where his or her hearing the case would create the appearance of partiality (In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136, 99 L. Ed. 942, 946, 75 S.Ct. 623, 625 (1955)). Those circumstances were present here.




CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the circuit court
of Edgar County dismissing the defendant's post-conviction petition
without an evidentiary hearing is reversed. We remand to the
circuit court for an evidentiary hearing in front of a newly
substituted judge.

Circuit court judgment reversed;







Docket No. 84721:
" had to deal with this trial judge's(Komada) failure to recuse himself from a capital case involving a post-conviction challenge. In People v. Steidl , 177 Ill. 2d 239 (1997), as here, the judge denied the post-conviction petition without an evidentiary hearing. In that case, however, our court reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing before a different judge, holding, inter alia , that the judge should have recused himself from the case because his long-term professional association with defendant's original trial attorney prevented him from making an unbiased assessment of defendant's claim that the attorney was ineffective. Steidl , 177 Ill. 2d at 265-66. The conflict in this case is no less serious than the one we condemned in Steidl . If anything, the compromise in this defendant's due process rights is even more egregious?

-----------------------------

STEIDL CASE CHRONOLOGY
Steidl Case Chronology


July 6, 1986: Firemen find the bodies of Karen and Dike Rhoads in their burning home in Paris, Illinois.

September 21, 1986; Darrell Harrington, an alcoholic with two convictions for writing bad checks, accuses Gordon R. (Randy) Steidl and Herbert R. Whitlock of the murders.

February 16, 1987: Deborah Reinbolt, an alcoholic and drug addict, tells police she was present when Gordon R. (Randy) Steidl and Herbert R. Whitlock committed the murders; she gives police a knife with a 5-inch blade, purportedly the murder weapon.

February 19, 1987: Paris police arrest Steidl and Whitlock.

March 10, 1987: Edgar County grand jury returns indictments charging Steidl and Whitlock with both murders.

May 22, 1987: Jury finds Whitlock guilty of the murder of Karen Rhoads, but acquits him of the murder of Dike Rhoads. He is sentenced to life in prison.

July 1987: Jury finds Steidl guilty of both murders.

August 12, 1987: Steidl sentenced to death.

September 28, 1988: Fourth District Illinois Appellate Court affirms Whitlocks conviction and sentence. People v. Whitlock, 174 Ill. App. 3d 749 (1988).

November 21, 1988: Harrington recants his trial testimony in a statement before a court reporter.

January 13, 1989: Reinbolt recants her trial testimony in a signed affidavit.

December 1989: Reinbolt and Harrington recant their recantations at a hearing before Judge Komada.

January 24, 1991: Illinois Supreme Court affirms Steidls conviction and death sentence. People v. Steidl, 142 Ill. 2d 204 (1991).

October 25, 1995: Without an evidentiary hearing, Judge Komada denies Steidls petition for post-conviction relief.

February 17-18, 1996 Reinbolt recants her trial testimony for the second time in a four hour, videotaped statement.

February 23, 1996: Reinbolt retracts her second recantation in an audiotaped statement to the Edgar County States Attorney.

December 11, 1996: On appeal of the denial of Steidl's post-conviction petition, the Illinois Supreme Court denies Steidl's request for a new trial, but grants a new sentencing hearing on the ground that his attorney provided ineffective assistance at the sentencing phase of the trial by failing to present evidence in mitigation.

February 18, 1999: Steidl resentenced to life in prison after prosecutors agree not to pursue the death penalty.

December 5, 2000: Fourth District Appellate Court denies Steidl a new trial.

April 4, 2001: Illinois Supreme Court denies the Petition for Leave to Appeal.

June 17, 2003: Judge Michael P. McCuskey, of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, orders a new trial for Steidl. Steidl v. Walls, 267 F. Supp. 2d 919 (2003).

March 25, 2004: After an intensive review of the case, Attorney General Lisa Madigan declines to appeal McCuskeys decision.

May 28, 2004: All charges against Steidl dropped and hours later he is released from the Danville Correctitonal Center.

Info Provided by Northwestern University
-------------------------------

google "People v. Steidl, No. 80341 komada" "

" Defendant's post-conviction proceedings were conducted by
Judge Paul Komada. At a June 5, 1989, motion hearing on defendant's
section 2--1401 petition, Judge Komada informed the parties that he
was acquainted with Illinois State Police Special Agent Jack
Eckerty, who was an investigator on the case. Four days after this
announcement, Judge Komada purchased a houseboat from Eckerty.
After the section 2--1401 hearing, and before post-conviction
proceedings, Judge Komada bought a second houseboat from Eckerty.
Judge Komada did not disclose the second purchase to the parties. "

" 85CHSGrad

And all will be well with the world when Todd gets in, right? Will see. "

" Pretty interesting boat deal !!! So these two men spent 20+ years of their lives behind bars in part due to then Judge Paul Komada. Just calling it like I see it. Care to elaborate Mr.Standerfer ? that's what I thought !!!!! "

" This is why I also will not be voting for Mr. Ferguson either...

(Theft, Dishonesty and Misrepresentation)

1. Between May 2003 and May 2006, Respondent (James F. Baba) was employed as an assistant state's attorney in Coles County, Illinois. Respondent's duties were to handle felony domestic violence cases and misdemeanor cases, as assigned by the State's Attorney.

2. On October 15, 2005, during a traffic stop, Coles County sheriff's deputies seized three plastic bags from a vehicle being driven by Steve Dollahan. Field testing by the arresting officer indicated that the bags contained cannabis. The seized evidence was secured in the evidence locker at the Coles County Sheriff's Department.

3. On October 17, 2005, Dollahan was charged in the circuit court of Coles County with two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol, illegal transportation of alcohol and improper lane usage. The charges were docketed as People v. Steven Dollahan, 05 DT 207, 05 TR 6102 and 05 TR 6103 (Coles County).

4. On October 26, 2005, a passenger in Dollahan's car, Matthew Niemerg, was charged in Coles County with illegal transportation of alcohol. That charge was docketed as People v. Niemerg, No. 05 TR 6111 (Coles County). On November 10, 2005, Niemerg was charged by information with possession of cannabis. Charges against Niemerg were docketed as People v. Niemerg, No. 05 CM 775 (Coles County).

5. On November 16, 2005, Dollahan pleaded guilty to the charges against him in Case No. 05 DT 207. The charges in case numbers 05 TR 6102 and 05 TR 6103 were dismissed. State's Attorney Steve Ferguson represented the State of Illinois at the hearing. Respondent was not assigned to People v. Dollahan, 05 DT 207 (Coles County) and at no time did he assist in the prosecution.

6. On November 16, 2005, Respondent appeared in Coles County Circuit Court on People v. Niemerg, No. 05 CM 775 and 05 TR 6111. On behalf of the State of Illinois, he asked that the charges against Niemerg be dismissed. An order was entered the same day dismissing the charges.

7. On Nov. 21, 2005, Respondent called Coles County Sheriff's Deputy James Redden, who was serving as the evidence custodian for the sheriff's department. Respondent advised Redden that he wished to retrieve the three plastic bags of cannabis that had been seized during the traffic stop that resulted in the charges filed in People v. Steven Dollahan, 05 DT 207, 05 TR 6102 and 05 TR 6103 (Coles County) and People v. Niemerg, No. 05 CM 775 and 05 TR 6111(Coles County).

8. During the November 22, 2005 telephone call, Respondent represented to Deputy Redden that he needed the items for "court purposes."

9. Respondent's representation to Deputy Redden, as set out in paragraph eight, above, that he needed the cannabis for court purposes on November 22, 2005, was false. On November 22, 2005, no case was pending which involved the 10.2 grams of cannabis as evidence.

10. Respondent knew that his representation to Deputy Redden, as set out in paragraph 8, was false.

11. Deputy Redden told Respondent that the material had not been tested by the Illinois State Police crime lab, but that he would make sure the substance in the plastic bags was tested appropriately before Respondent needed it.

12. After ending the conversation with Respondent, Deputy Redden contacted Mattoon Police Officer Scott Moran and made arrangements to meet him the next morning at the East Central Illinois Law Enforcement Training Center, where Officer Moran weighed and performed forensic testing on the substances. The test results were positive for cannabis.

13. At about 7:45 a.m. November 22, 2005, Deputy Redden returned to the Coles County Sheriff's Department and put the three plastic bags containing cannabis in a temporary holding locker, pending pick-up by Respondent.

14. At approximately 1:30 p.m. November 22, 2005, Respondent came to the Coles County Sheriff's Department to obtain the plastic bags.

15. Respondent signed a property receipt, writing on the receipt that the evidence was being received "for court," and Deputy Redden turned over possession of the three plastic bags of plant material, which contained a total of 10.2 grams of cannabis, to Respondent.

16. At no time did Respondent return the cannabis to the Coles County Sheriff's Office.

17. At all times while employed by the Coles County State's Attorney, Respondent was prohibited by the policy of the Coles County Sheriff's Office and the Coles County State's Attorney's Office to have possession of evidence without a court-related or employment-related reason to do so.

18. At all times while employed by the Coles County State's Attorney, Respondent was required by the policy of the Coles County Sheriff's Office and the Coles County State's Attorney's Office to return evidence to the custody of the sheriff if he did not need possession of it for work-related or court purposes.

19. At all times alleged in this complaint, 720 ILCS 5/16-1(a)(2) provided in part:

Theft.

(a) A person commits theft when he knowingly:

(1) obtains or exerts unauthorized control over the property of the owner; or

(2) obtains by deception control over property of the owner.

20. By receiving the 10.2 grams of cannabis being held as evidence by the Coles County Sheriff's Department after falsely telling Deputy James Redden that he needed the evidence for court purposes, Respondent committed theft.

21. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:

committing a criminal act, to wit, theft, in violation of 720 ILCS 5/16-1, which reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(3) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;
conversion;
failure to hold property of a client or third person separate from the lawyer's own property, in violation of Rule 1.15(a) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;

failure to deliver to a client or third person property that the client or third person is entitled to receive, in violation of Rule 1.15(b) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;
conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(4) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;
conduct which is prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice or brings the courts or the legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 770.

WHEREFORE, the Administrator respectfully requests that this matter be assigned to a panel of the Hearing Board, that a hearing be held, and that the panel make findings of fact, conclusions of fact and law, and a recommendation for such discipline as is warranted.

Deborah Barnes, Counsel
Attorney Registration and
Disciplinary Commission
1 Old Capitol Plaza North, Suite #333
Springfield, Illinois 62701
Telephone: (217) 522-6838 Respectfully submitted,
Jerome Larkin, Administrator
Attorney Registration and
Disciplinary Commission

=========================

Why did it take over 2 years for the public to become aware of this?

Do we not pay your wages Mr. Ferguson?
To powerful of a job, to not be held responsible!

Why haven't you given us a reason for the firing of Asst. SA Longwell? Your "No Comment" is very suspicious after learning of the above incident!


3 Candidates...Only 1 Choice!!! "

" 1. The Murder of the Rhoads couple.
2. The boat " S.S. Covergirl"
3. Carlson Oil Development
4. Role in the Cumberland County Grand Jury and his gooood friend.
5. Do the tile in your home match those in the cumberland county court house. I hear they were $60.00 a piece.
6. Did Komada ever act as an acting judge over Martha Hayden.
Perhaps all of the law enforemcement supporters for Komada should demand proof for each and every one of these allegations. It is unlikely that Komada will ever answer or put himself in a debate in which he is forced by the citizens of Coles county to explain his actions, or lack of actions. I may go to the library tmrw. "

" 85grad failed to mention that even with Baba signing the release, (that he took the marijuana), no charges were ever filed. "

" a little lengthy grad, but ur work is appreciated. :) "

" 85CHSGrad wrote on Oct 13, 2008 7:40 PM:

" Defendant's post-conviction proceedings were conducted by
Judge Paul Komada. At a June 5, 1989, motion hearing on defendant's
section 2--1401 petition, Judge Komada informed the parties that he
was acquainted with Illinois State Police Special Agent Jack
Eckerty, who was an investigator on the case. Four days after this
announcement, Judge Komada purchased a houseboat from Eckerty.
After the section 2--1401 hearing, and before post-conviction
proceedings, Judge Komada bought a second houseboat from Eckerty.
Judge Komada did not disclose the second purchase to the parties. "

......................

Is this the baseless and anonymous shady boat deal Harry was asking about?

It sounds like hanky panky to me, how about you Tom? Oh yeah, sorry...I forgot, he's a Republican and therefore above reproach.

Thanks for the info, Todd. "

" Ed's a nice guy, but has zero qualifications for the office. In looking at the two candidates and their qualifications, there should be no question as to who we elect. Can anyone seriously make a claim that Ed is more qualified than the current coroner? Does anyone, other than Tom Andres, have an opinion on that? "

" HP

Do you know what the qualifications for coroner are? None, Notta, Zip. Anyone can be the coroner. Besides, Ed worked at Schillings Funeral Home for many years before John replaced him with his son, he now works for Jerdins. "

" Herry potter I am glad that you made the statement that you did about qualifications for the coroners office. For those of you like harry potter who dont know what they are... #1 Must be 21 years old. #2 Must live in Coles County. #3 Must be a United States citizen. The coroner doesnt perfrom autopsies. The coroner is nothing more than a represenative for the for the County. The coroner is in a NO WAY A MEDICAL EXAMINER OR A CSI. The Coroner needs to be able to treat families with respect, compassion, and be discreet. Mr. Nichols is none of the of the above. Telling stories to anyone who will listen to him at whatever bar he is at or driving through town at excessive speeds with lights flashing and stars on the side of his car is not discreet! For those of you who are concerned with misspending MR NICHOLS HAS BEEN QUOTED AS SAYING HE ATTENDS FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIRED. The excessive amounts of seminars cannot be applied to what he does for the county however, WE THE TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING FOR IT ALL. Im not against education but let him pay for excessive classes on his own dime. WE NEED CHANGE, AND THE FAMILES OF COLES COUNTY DESERVE BETTER! "

" Harry Potter wrote on Oct 14, 2008 7:52 AM:

" Ed's a nice guy, but has zero qualifications for the office. In looking at the two candidates and their qualifications, there should be no question as to who we elect. Can anyone seriously make a claim that Ed is more qualified than the current coroner? Does anyone, other than Tom Andres, have an opinion on that? "
--------------------

Seriously, robin, how did you interpret the above as asking what are the qualifications for coroner are? Geesh, it's pretty bad when you have to cut and past your own messages to clarify things for the moron set.

I won't bother to try to explain the question, because in all honesty I doubt you would get it.

Like the rest of your misinformed post, you are woefully ignorant as to who has been paying for Nichols trainings. You might want to do a little research before you continue to make an fool of yourself in the future. "

" robin8002 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:50 PM:

" injustice 85 YOU MUST BE A NICHOLS LOVER I TAKE IT ! Baseless comments will get you nowhere grow up "

-----------------------

Now read what robin said @ 11:00 AM, baseless comments, indeed! L:O:L! "

" Harry let me point out the obvious for you! When you say "zero qualifications' you clearly tell myself and the rest of the readers you dont know what your talking about! When the ONLY qualifications are to be 21, reside in the county and to be a US citizen! Thats why I had to educate you on them. So yes ED has more than enough qualifications to be the next Coroner!. The office of the coroner is not about performing autopsies (which are done by a medical examiner) its about taking care of the public and helping grieving families. The coroner pronounces the death and then if their is an investigation it is done by a medical examiner or the State CSI team. And yes the taxpayers are paying for excessive amounts of classes! So harry please for your own good when you don't know what you are talking about please do us all a favor and be quiet! "

" 4. He has a record of being fair but firm when prosecuting criminals.???

Yeah, that's why they called the coles county jail the Kamada Ramada when he was in office. AS far as light sentences, Chief Judge Waller ofter overruled Kamada's stiff sentenses whis id one of th reasons he stepped down. "

" hardly baseless Robin, i heard the man (ed schniers) with my own ears diss on people with Barack Obama signs, unprofessional and disrespectful, childish even, thats my base for it, I could care less who gets coroner but Nichols knocked on my door, Schniers didn't and I live fairly close by "

" talk about baseless claims Robin, Ed schniers is qualified but that is besides the point, we don't need disrespectful people who throw fits over signs in office, simple as that, if he is so friendly and respectful why didn't he come to his neighbors for support? "

" thanks for the support Harry, Robin obviously supports candidates who are as disrespectful as she is "

" STILL NO RESPONSE FROM YOU HARRY ON MY POST EARLIER. I GUESS NO ANSWER MEANS YOU REALLY DON'T KNOW HAVE AN ANSWER. SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE ONE FOR EVERYTHING ELSE YOU ARE PRETTY IGNORANT LIKE EVERYONE THINKS YOU ARE!!!!!!!!! "

" Mr. Schniers has personally walked the majority of the county and with his supporters continues to walk door to door; Crossing party lines, I myself am a democrat and am voting for Senator Obama. Bottomline injustice 85 Im sorry that you were not home when he came by your home to ask for your support. I vote for who is the best person for the job not just straight party lines. He is professional and always has been in everything that he does. He is proud to have his signs next to a variety of other canidates from all parties, end of story. "

" mjgtm wrote on Oct 15, 2008 2:33 PM:

" STILL NO RESPONSE FROM YOU HARRY ON MY POST EARLIER. I GUESS NO ANSWER MEANS YOU REALLY DON'T KNOW HAVE AN ANSWER. SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE ONE FOR EVERYTHING ELSE YOU ARE PRETTY IGNORANT LIKE EVERYONE THINKS YOU ARE!!!!!!!!! "

-----------------------

My my, it looks like someone is throwing a hissy fit. All capitol letters usually denote anger. Are you angry? Here's a thought for you, perhaps I didn't answer your question because, in all candor, I thought is was rather stupid. I have now idea of you are talking about, and I seriously doubt you do. I usually don't respond to something I have no idea about, as do most intelligent people.

Put your thoughts together in a coherent manner, post them, and maybe I'll consider answering your question, as inane as it will no doubt be.

By the way, I ask a lot of questions, some get answered, some don't, but unlike you I don't throw a hissy fit like a 12 year old.

I asked the question as to Ed Schniers qualifications, and all I got was a run down on the minimum requirements, and some convoluted rambling about medical examiners, Nichols being over trained and his having a star on his vehicle. And this was from a Schniers supporter, a family member I suspect, and not a thing a about why he was qualified.

Obviously the only thing he has going for him is that he meets the minimum standards. Should I throw a fit and post a demand for an answer to my question, and in all caps too? "

" WHY HECK YES!! DO THAT HARRY! YOU ALSO NEED SPELLING LESSONS "

" not end of story Robin, someone is always home at my house, the point is he never came, tehn he got mad when Nichols did and asked a sign to be put in my yard, i din't support any side for coroner until Mr. Nichols asked, Mr. Schniers didn't have along walk but he sure never made it, it has nothing to do with party Robin, perhaps you shouldn't post until you know what you're talking about "

" sure he meets the standards, but either way his manner was extremely childish and unprofessional, nothing to do with party, i am a democrat and voted for a few republicans today, this is about decency, respect for fellow neighbors and citizens, professional courtesy, and moral citizenship, not about party, not about Mike Nichols "

" on another note he kind of reminds me of you robin, you made your comments in a critical and disrespectful manner as well, perhaps you should run for coroner "

" mjgtm wrote on Oct 15, 2008 5:45 PM:

" WHY HECK YES!! DO THAT HARRY! YOU ALSO NEED SPELLING LESSONS "

Are we witnessing a complete meltdown?

Spelling lessons? And to think I gave you a complete pass on your poor grammar. LOL!

Perhaps you're taking this whole thing too serious, mjgtm.

Life is too short to get so worked up over such a trivial thing. "

" injustice 85, you making up lies about canidates will get you nowhere. There are no "minimum" requirements as you state. Only requiredments. You making up some kind of wild story is so disrespectful. You are very full of yourself that much is obvious. I how much your being paid to post your made up 'fairy tails" on here. "

" Actually, nj, I suspect she's the spouse. If so, you gotta sympathise with the guy. "

" some people have nothing better to do harry lol "

" Telling stories to anyone who will listen to him at whatever bar he is at or driving through town at excessive speeds with lights flashing and stars on the side of his car is not discreet!

----------------------------------

Seriously, rosi.....I mean robin, do you really want to talk about made up disrespectful stories? LOL! "

" lol Robin you have said nothing about the actual point, you have spent your entire time blogging negatives about me, that is exactly what i'm saying here about common disrespect towards people, what happened, happened, I don't invent fairy tales for my own entertainment, what I do is find the actual injustices occuring in my general society and I use my right of voice ( and typing) to speak about them, disagree if you want to disagree but have some dignity and respect if possible "

" i wish i was getting paid to speak out about distasteful citizens such as yourself who accuse people of lying all the while missing the real point, sad to even say it but man that sounds like something typical conservatives would do, there now i feel a tad bit guilty "

" Looks like Ed banned Rosie from the computer for a while. "

" well it is crunch time Harry lol, guilt can be overwhelming though "

" After all that i have seen, i dont see how komada or ferguson stand a chance in heck to win. Protect our Children, or get out! "

" yup, we need Todd Reardon as far as i'm concerned at this point "