Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
73°F
If you could add a contest to Bagelfest what would it be?
More
Bagel toss
Bagel eating
Bagel stacking
Bagel recipes
Bagel crafts
View Results
 


















 
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:33 PM CDT
Meet Pete Hegseth



DENVER — Wednesday night’s Democratic National Convention focused on America’s security. It was one of the more memorable evenings of my life and it had nothing to do with the activities in the Convention Hall.

His name is Pete Hegseth. And even though he’s only 28 years of age, he’s been interviewed by MTV, CNN, National Public Radio, Fox, MSNBC, CNBC and the AP. Pete can now add the Mattoon Journal Gazette and the Charleston Times Courier to that list.

Pete’s remarkable story begins in Forest Lake, MN (pop. 6,000). One of three sons of a high school basketball coach and stay-at-home mom, Pete excelled at basketball. In fact, basketball was his ticket to attend Princeton University.

At Princeton, Pete’s focus was not limited to the hardwood. He served as publisher of the school newspaper, The Princeton Tory, and was also a member of the ROTC. In fact, in the latter half of his college career, Pete signed with the National Guard to help defray his college expenses. (Princeton doesn’t offer athletic scholarships, only the opportunity to play.)

Following graduation, Pete’s life was flurry of activity. He married. And, he and his new bride began their careers on Wall Street with investment banking firms. It was just one month after the wedding, and Pete received the call. His guard unit was called to active duty.

Although the war in Iraq was at full throttle, Pete’s unit drew the lucky assignment of providing external security at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Not a tough assignment; in fact his unit was rarely in contact with the prisoners detained there. Following his year in Guantanamo, Pete retuned to his waiting bride and the Wall Street job.

Only three months later, Pete sat at his desk; the news was filled with the latest tragedy in Iraq. A U.S. soldier had been distributing candy to children in an Iraqi city square. The suicide bomber stepped forward and ended the life of the soldier along with 15 young lives.

That day, Pete decided his work on Wall Street paled in comparison to the impact he might make in Iraq. He called the army and asked if he might become a platoon leader in Iraq. While political leaders were pushing for what some called a cut-and-run strategy in Iraq, Pete wanted to leave a cushy job and beautiful bride to put himself in harm’s way. Talk about courage.

Ten weeks from that fateful day, Pete landed in Iraq. Two months later he led his platoon of 40 members on an air assault raid in Baghdad. As the helicopter was landing in the chaos of that battle, Pete thought to himself, “I can’t believe I volunteered for this.” Unknown to him, he had actually volunteered for a much bigger role in the war against terrorism.

With the success of Pete’s platoon in Baghdad, he was assigned to Samara, a city considered the “hell hole” of the country. Near civil war was in full bloom as tribal leaders battled with sheiks and imams. And into the fray entered Pete Hegseth. He was assigned the unenviable task of bringing peace to these groups that had been warring for centuries. And just two days before Pete began this delicate assignment, the Golden Mosque, a spiritual center, was bombed.

Deploying his Midwestern sensibilities and earnestness, Pete gained the trust of the warring factions. He offered sympathy with determination. And the foes responded. Pete made progress in bringing civility to the city, but he could not end the violence. Before he could respond to that frustration his tour was completed.

He returned home to the US in July of 2006, but his thoughts and heart remained in Iraq. Pete’s frustrations were due two overriding views on Iraq. First, he felt, the enemy had to be defeated. Second, he was frustrated by the ground strategy — what he called the Vietnam approach.

In Samara, Pete’s group was stationed on the exterior of the city, but they were trying to provide security throughout the many neighborhoods. While they might restore order in an area for a day or a week, returning to their base offered the enemy a chance to return.

Upon his return to the U.S., Pete composed a 15-page report on his perspective of Iraq. In particular, he saw that with the return of each group from Iraq, valuable insight was lost in the rotation. His report was to be a primer for his successors.

He then went onto compose an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal titled, “More troops please.” The piece advocated an increase in the level of troop involvement and a new approach to dealing with the enemy. One could even call it a “surge” idea.

Pete’s report and the op-ed piece were circulated through a host of governmental offices including Congress and the Bush administration. Six months later, President Bush announced the highly controversial surge policy.

The modest Hegseth is quick to point out that the surge policy was not his idea alone, but was advocated by a host of others. He calls his effort “one bullet in the magazine of ideas.”

It was shortly thereafter that Pete met Wade Zirkle, the founder of a fledgling organization named, Vets for Freedom, which gives a voice to the returning war veterans. As Pete tells it, the public discourse on the war rarely includes the valuable insight of the feet on the ground — the veterans. In fact, only anti-war veterans were seen on TV until Vets for Freedom was created.

Pete was invited to join Vets for Freedom in its earliest days. But he envisioned the power and promise of the mission. Through the foundation laid by Zirkel, and Pete’s leadership, Vets for Freedom boasts more than 30,000 members. It includes chapters in all 50 states. So many of the members have compelling stories on the efforts and successes in Iraq. And their mission is simple. They simply want to share their story with America.

Due to his leadership, Pete became the chairman of the Vets for Freedom in 2007.

By September 2007, the surge was working — a fact that so many in the media and Congress would refuse to acknowledge. Along came Pete’s group. Vets for Freedom delivered countless veterans to Capitol Hill to tell the story of success. While many still refused to listen, their story was too compelling to ignore.

It even impacted the political campaigns of 2008. In the spring of 2008, the Vets for Freedom created their first ad, one exclusive to the Internet. The ad pointed out that Sen. Barack Obama, a possible presidential nominee and member of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, had never met with Gen. Petraeus, the commander of the Iraq campaign. While Obama was free with his negative view of Iraq, he had never thought to have a private meeting with the general.

So Vets for Freedom put out the ad on a Friday in spring. It’s typically a poor day to make the news cycle. The ad was anything but typical. By Sunday morning the ad was the focus of “Meet the Press.”

From the Vets for Freedom firsthand view, the surge is working. This is something that candidate Obama refuses to acknowledge. And Nancy Pelosi still maintains “the surge is a failure.”

Pete acknowledged that groups of Iraqi veterans exist who have a counter view of the war. But those groups have less than 1,000 members. Thirty times as many members in Vets for Freedom make a compelling counter-argument.

Pete just returned to Iraq this month. He wanted to update his view of the war. He pointed out that 15 of 18 benchmarks for Iraq have now been achieved. The city council meeting he attended in Samara, just last week, barely discussed issues of security. Things have gotten that good.

More to the point, violence has dropped considerably in Iraq. U.S. troops are returning home without having to be replaced. Al Qaida no longer has a haven, and Iran no longer has undue influence in the region.

Pete’s is a compelling story of courage in Iraq and in the United States. His attendance at the convention is to ensure that the story of Iraq from the Americans closest to the facts is heard.

As the Democrats express concern over the war in Iraq, it’s ironic that, for the first time in 44 years, their presidential ticket does not include a veteran. Despite many politicians’ best efforts, Pete Hegseth is making sure that the veteran’s voice is not forgotten or diminished.

Bob Schultz is an East Central Illinois businessman, investor and political enthusiast. Although he identifies as a Republican, he is attending the Democratic National Convention to bring JG/T-C readers a local perspective.


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:38 AM:

" Privileged to be present at one of the great moments in American history, the major party nomination for president of a man from a race once enslaved by this country, Bob here chooses instead to regurgitate Republican propaganda in an attempt whitewash Bush's $3-billion-a-week Iraq disaster. That's both petty and pathetic. "

The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 7:45 AM:

" By the way, Bob, since you apparently hadn't heard, violence erupted throughout central, eastern and northern Iraq on Tuesday, leaving at least 45 dead and 79 wounded. So much for your surge claptrap. "

Listener wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:02 AM:

" What Bob Schultz doesn't say is that Pete Hegseth and his Veterans for Freedom Organization is best known as a "Swiftboating" group. Check out what our Illinois Senator Dick Durbin said regarding this group when he appeared on Face the Nation.
http://www.jedreport.com/2008/05/mccain-calls-sw.html "

Read all over wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:33 AM:

" Thanks, Listener, for being a more diligent reporter than anyone at our paper and shining some light on the real purpose and structure of this group.

And Mr. Schultz, if this is the best you can do while witnessing history, you should've saved your money and stayed home. "

The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 1:26 PM:

" Hey, Bob, remember when Bush diverted U.S. military resources to invade Iraq after having spectacularly FAILED to capture or kill the mastermind who had actually planned and executed 9-11?
Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.
That, you may recall, was the title of an intelligence briefing given to Bush on Aug. 6, 2001. A month later, its exact meaning was made extremely clear.
The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority, and we will not rest until we find him. Thats a quote from Bush on Sept. 13, 2001.
But six months later, priorities had somehow changed, and we were definitely at rest.
I dont know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really dont care. Its not that important. Its not our priority. Thats what Bush said on March 13, 2002. By then the Pentagon and the CIA, on orders from the White House, had virtually called off the manhunt and pulled out the Special Operations troops and CIA paramilitary units. Their orders were to leave Afghanistan and prepare for the invasion of Iraq.
Then, in their final debate, presidential candidate
John Kerry quoted Bush as saying he was not that
concerned about Osama bin Laden.
Gosh, I dont think I ever said Im not worried about Osama bin Laden. Thats kind of one of those
exaggerations, Bush answered with one of his moronic, simian chortles.
No, in fact it was kind of the exact, documented truth. "

Becky wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:05 PM:

" This young man was put in harms way because a bunch of spoiled, rich brats who have never been in the military got into power and wanted to prove how macho they are. This young groom should have been at home with his new bride. Put in harms way because of lies and half truths. I, for one, will not accept Bush's war of conquest as a victory. It's an abomination of power. "

Mike P wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:21 PM:

" Perhaps it was missed in all the clambor, the story of the marine patrolling for mines, roadside bombs and snipers, in humvees with no doors, no armor, and now often suspect body armor. His family got the news of his death, and got the ball rolling to get proper equipment into the fight.

All soldiers have their own views of the reality there. All are respected for their service, and many sacrifices. Casualties and shatered lives are a part of war. Many come back having escaped physical harm, but never whole, inspite of it. Thousands have died, countless more wounded. All the training, advanced weapons and technology, will never make for a campaign like this, being a swift and firm, over and done mission. Door to door warfare, is nothing that should ever be undermanned and drawn out in long engagements. Lessons from the past should have instilled that.

History and consequence is lost to many. Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.

We armed and often trained most of those we were fighting, again. It is an unfortunate truth, and continues to go on. We blow things up, pay to build them again, arm train and organize, then leave to see if it woks out. We can't be long term regional mercenaries. We can't be constantly in the middle of unwinable unending missions. There have been many sucessful missions, but at this point, keeping a win loss score card, is moot. Sometimes they have to fight for what they believe in, on their own.

We shouldn't be the hand that shapes the worlds maps and borders. There are other ways to effect change, than to risk American lives, and limitless amounts of dollars. No price can be placed on lives, they are infinately valuable. Improper planning, manning, arming, and armor, should have a price attached to it. We all get to pay on the tab run up on that for the rest of our lives. Those directly rosponsible for it happaning as it did, likely never will. A few hundred thousand lives, commited to this fight will be our constant reminder.

I hope we never find we didn't learn from this, and that we never find any of our troops commited in this manner again. "

The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:29 PM:

" Its been five full years since George W. Bush pranced around in his GI Joe playsuit on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared that major combat operations were over in Iraq.
The president, wearing a green flight suit and
holding a white helmet, got off the plane, saluted
those on the flight deck and shook hands with them, CNN reported then. Above him, the tower was adorned with a big sign that read, Mission Accomplished.
That infamous sign, by the way, had of course been produced by the White House, although Bush later tried to blame it on the ships crew.
And Bush was just as right about Iraq as hes been about everything else. "

Matt Toon wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:09 PM:

" Bob, as a Catholic, you ought to pay more attention to the Holy See. Pope John Paul II strongly opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq as immoral.

Also, your column tends to disprove the widely held belief that the mainstream media is biased against conservatives and conservatism. Nearly every national news outlet that you say interviewed this man are alleged by conservatives to have a liberal bias. It doesn't sound like they have much of such bias. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 28, 2008 5:28 PM:

" Thanks a lot, TQ. I had finally got the image of that little fairycake prancing around in his fly-boy wannabe suit out of my mind, and after all this time you had to go and bring that image up again. LOL! By the way I saw where Bush even wore a couple of medals on his uniform that he didn't even earn, surprised? I'm not. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 28, 2008 5:33 PM:

" I thought this was supposed to be about the Democratic convention. Bob seems to have turned it into an infomercial for Bush's invasion and occupation of Iraq.

And yeah Matt Toon, you pointed out the biggest hoax ever perpetuated on the American public about the main stream media's bias. "

Sunbeam wrote on Aug 29, 2008 6:20 AM:

" Personally I thoroughly enjoyed the article and reading something positive for a change. I highly recommended it to several friends. Would that there would be more like Pete who work at doing something constructive rather than sit around badmouthing someone all the time. "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:44 AM:

" I agree with the question, in yesterdays paper there was a great article from Penny Weaver about these writers being biased "

ed miller wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:52 AM:

" The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:38 AM:

" Privileged to be present at one of the great moments in American history, the major party nomination for president of a man from a race once enslaved by this country, Bob here chooses instead to regurgitate Republican propaganda"



Typical liberal. Any positive news from Iraq must be a lie. Oh yeah and Obama is Black so we all have to vote for him or we are racists. "

The Question wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:28 AM:

" Ed, this nation has committed $3-$4 trillion it doesn't have and gotten a million Iraqis killed in order to eliminate the threat of weapons that didn't exist. You call that good news, do you? "

ed miller wrote on Aug 29, 2008 11:19 AM:

" What the media should be doing is crucifying Pelosi and Reid for not listening to their Generals and delaying the surge, which forced troops to do more with less and cost lives. The media won't admit that their liberal princess was wrong and that congress should listen to people who have actually BEEN to Iraq. Even Obama had to rush a trip there to pose for some quick photos with soldiers to make himself look more "Presidential". "

The Question wrote on Aug 29, 2008 12:38 PM:

" "What the media should be doing is crucifying Pelosi and Reid for not listening to their Generals and delaying the surge."
------------
So you're saying that the chimpanzee is not the commander in chief, after all? Well, we all knew he was never up to it, didn't we?
And why am I not surprised that you like the idea of crucifixion, Eddie? "

Martha K. Yeakel wrote on Aug 29, 2008 12:40 PM:

" I don't believe anybody 'forced' this young man to serve his country. Great article, Bob, meant to honor one of our fine young men who CHOSE to protect all of us from the terrorist threat. Too bad some cannot see beyond their own prejudices and ever, ever read anything objectively. Talk about spin! "

The Question wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:03 PM:

" Iraq -- the invasion, destruction and occupation of a country that never attacked or threatened the U.S. -- will go down in history as the one of the greatest foreign policy crimes ever committed by the U.S. It's a crime that may yet bankrupt this nation financially, as it has already bankrupted us morally. Future generations of Americans will spit at the mention of the name "Bush."
But hey, at least the U.S. subjugation of Iraq has made lots of money for the murderous thugs at Blackwater and for Halliburton, the gang rape corporation. What those seven Halliburton staffers did to that 20-year-old woman is symbolic of what the corporation has done to this nation. But what else could you expect from Dick Cheney's company? "

father bob wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:14 PM:

" ed miller wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:52 AM:
" The Question wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:38 AM:
Typical liberal. Any positive news from Iraq must be a lie. Oh yeah and Obama is Black so we all have to vote for him or we are racists. """"

______________

now you're getting it....einstein "

father bob wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:18 PM:

" ed miller wrote on Aug 29, 2008 11:19 AM:
" What the media should be doing is crucifying Pelosi and Reid for not listening to their Generals and delaying the surge, which forced troops to do more with less and cost lives.""""

it's not the surge moron...its the 12' walls around the cities and neighborhoods that keep people at bay. the only way out is through one checkpoint in each direction.

if ya can beat 'em hold them prisoners. "

father bob wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:19 PM:

" Martha K. Yeakel wrote on Aug 29, 2008 12:40 PM:
" I don't believe anybody 'forced' this young man to serve his country. Great article, Bob, meant to honor one of our fine young men who CHOSE to protect all of us from the terrorist threat. Too bad some cannot see beyond their own prejudices and ever, ever read anything objectively."""
_______________

you ma'am, are not very bright. "

sapient wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:38 PM:

" Listener: I'm really interested in what Dick Durbin had to say. He probably rates number two between number one Obama and number three Biden on the senate's most liberal list. "

Martha K. Yeakel wrote on Aug 29, 2008 3:49 PM:

" Father Bob: Please explain the 'dimness' of my post. Thank you. "

Martha K. Yeakel wrote on Aug 29, 2008 4:08 PM:

" On second thought (oh, she does think folks!), might it be that you think I'm 'dim' because you don't agree with anything I say and vice versa? At one time, that would have been called having a discussion but it seems with some it is just easier to question the intellect of your opponent. "

ed miller wrote on Aug 29, 2008 4:33 PM:

" Bingo Martha. If you do not agree with FB, you are apparently an idiot. He considers himself omniscient. "

Hahvahd wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:27 PM:

" Personally, after the past 8 years of their leadership on the national level and the great mess it's created for the public, I think admitting to being a Republican should be a recognized symptom of insanity and for those still defending this administration, it should be grounds for having you committed to a mental institution. Seriously. We're not talking about intelligence, Martha and Ed, but sanity. "

Hahvahd wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:32 PM:

" Rotty mentioned something on another thread about sinking all the politicians at the bottom of the ocean.

Like a typical Repug, he can't see reality. Where would we be but for Dems like Kennedy and Biden and Clinton and Durbin and Obama and Pelosi and all the others standing between the common citizen and ruin at the hands of the Republican greed machine?

Instead, I think we should lock up most if not all of the Republicans in Congress and the Bush Administration in the prisons they belong in, and the folks who voted for them should be locked in mental institutions and given shock therapy. Think about what a better world that would create! "

Martha K. Yeakel wrote on Aug 29, 2008 11:21 PM:

" Sounds a bit like "1984" to me! "

Rotty wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:34 AM:

" Hahvahd, I see my quip about ALL politicians being full of hot air went right over your head.
Why am I not surprised - typical libtard are ya?
LOL!

Lock away all Republicans, or those that have differing thoughts, than yours?
And you think I can't see reality?
LOL!

You're funny - come back & try again, when you haven't spent an evening killing off the few brain cells you have left in your tiny cranium.
LOL!

While I may be a little more "right" leaning, I have voted for many Democrats throughout my life.

My point was that most, if not ALL, politicians are full of compost, especially when they're trying to gain your vote.

Get the picture now, oh bright one?
LOL! "

ed miller wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:42 AM:

" Personally, I think everyone should be voted out of the federal government. Everyone blames Bush, but he is just the figurehead. The Democrats control congress and are just as much to blame. New politicians come around every 2-4 years promising to "change" the government and "help the working man". People are suckered into it every time.

The only way to send an effective message is to vote for a different party. I know many of you here are brainwashed. Your Daddy was a Democrat, so you would vote Democrat no matter what. There are several other parties such as Libertarian, Green, Constitutional, and even a bunch of radical nutcases. The point is, many of these parties have good ideas, but they are virtually ignored by the mainstream media. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 30, 2008 9:01 AM:

" Personally, I would be satisfied just to see Dick Cheney tried for war crimes, Hahvahd. That reprobate has enriched himself and the rest of his family with the profits of the arms industries who have been dictating our foreign policy for years now.

This unethical thug makes Spiro Agnew look like a choir boy. LOL!

As was noted earlier in the week, how many boards of directors has this man, his wife, his children and their spouses sat on over the last several years. War profiteering should be a crime punishable by life in prison.

Think about that when you watch this immoral and reprehensible criminal speak to the salivating flock next week. "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 30, 2008 10:30 AM:

" we've had bad dems and bad reps, what matters is now and as of now we waste money on a bogus war and we pay for Bush's tax crap and behind all that we've been losing unity and that needs restored "

The Question wrote on Aug 30, 2008 10:43 AM:

" What political party controlled both the White House and the Congress for all but two years of this century, Eddie? That would be the party that got everything it wanted. You can judge the results for yourself. "

The Question wrote on Aug 30, 2008 1:30 PM:

" Hey, has anybody seen a preview of that new sitcom, "Grandpa John and the Beauty Queen?" "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 30, 2008 2:05 PM:

" you ma'am, are not very bright. "

I was thinking the same thing, fb, and that goes way back to the time she got mad and said she would never post on here again, after being taken to task for her inane support of any and all Repugs, regardless of what they had done. LOL! "

 



Police issue 141 alcohol-related citations

Retired administrators to share school duties

State to lay off 450, close parks and historic sites

Second suspect charged in caustic liquid attack

U of I plans October appearance by John Edwards

New lineup of music and shows awaits Casey
Popcorn Festival-goers

Rotary pool to end season with a splash

Electricity costs still an issue a
year after rate relief legislation

Jobs will be harder to get for teachers suspected of abuse

Banquet to highlight Latino heritage month

Public invited to view Jupiter from EIU observatory

Meet Pete Hegseth

AFSCME contract includes 15 percent raise over four years

Obama is nation's first black presidential nominee

New cop ready to dog criminals

Douglas County won't seek criminal charges in alleged puppy mill case

School board names CMS assistant principals, CHS AD

Fire crews extinguish blaze north of Shelbyville

Area libraries present Lincoln-Douglas Debates traveling exhibit

Arthur Cheese Festival kicks off Saturday

McCain's previous foe speaks out

Lincoln Log Cabin targeted

Governor to slash 450 jobs, close historic sites

Possible closing of Wolf Creek, Hidden Springs angers residents

McCain stays mum about vice presidential pick

Zoning board approves new Charleston bed and breakfast

New Katrina death tally: Half of victims 75 and up

2 homeless people held for attack on woman

First Coles property tax payment due Friday

No winner of $2.5 million jackpot

©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us