Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:34 PM CDT
COLUMN: Who's to blame, who's responsible -- I say it's Bicycle/Phone Guy's fault
By PENNY WEAVER, News editor pweaver@jg-tc.com
So, I saw this guy on Wednesday riding his bicycle while talking on his cell phone.
It wasn’t even that simple.
He was headed south in a lane of traffic on 16th Street at Charleston Avenue in Mattoon. He stopped to wait for the light to change, yakking on the cell phone, switching it to the other ear after a few seconds, and yakking some more.
Really, is there NO place we won’t take these gol-darned mobile phones, dadblameit?
Thank God we don’t all have videophones yet. I bet Bicycle/Phone Guy takes that phone into the bathroom with him. Poor Aunt Edna on the other end of the line has no idea that he’s on the pot after eating chili for lunch.
I just hope no one ever comes up with Smell-O-Phone.
Maybe I’m just jealous because I’m not that coordinated. I don’t think I could ride a bike with one hand on the handlebars and the other holding a phone to my ear. I surely couldn’t do it while trying to watch for traffic.
I probably could manage the phone during a bathroom stint, but then again, with my luck, Cousin Linda would end up talking to the water in the toilet bowl. Are cell phones waterproof? I think not.
What I really wondered when I saw Bicycle/Phone Guy, though, was who would be to blame when he gets hit by a car.
I mean, multitasking is one thing, but surely this carries it too far. I know people talk on their cell phones while driving a car — yeah, me too, I confess — but I also know some drivers who shouldn’t chew gum and drive at the same time, let alone yak or text.
What it comes back to, in my mind, is who’s going to take the blame — and who’s going to take responsibility.
Uh huh: You think the two are the same, don’t ya? Maybe they are, and maybe they aren’t. Let’s look at what Mr. Merriam-Webster has to say:
“Blame: to find fault with.”
“Responsible: liable to be called on to answer” or “being the cause or explanation.”
Oops, the “blame” entry also says “to hold responsible,” or, “to blame: at fault, or responsible.”
Ah, but “responsible” also equates to “able to answer for one’s conduct and obligations: trustworthy,” Merriam-Webster says. Therefore, someone might be responsible for his actions, but not necessarily a responsible person.
For example, a Douglas County coroner’s jury put the blame for a Mattoon teenager’s death on the driver of the vehicle in which he rode. But will that driver be responsible — as in, will he take the responsibility? Or will he be given the blame?
In case you missed it, the coroner’s jury on Tuesday said the June 13 death of Matt M. Foltz, 18, of Mattoon was a homicide because the driver of the car in which Foltz was a passenger allegedly pushed the vehicle to more than 100 mph before the deadly crash.
The jury put the blame squarely on Seth Brooks, 24, of Charleston, the driver who allegedly was reckless or negligent in his actions, which resulted in Foltz’s death, according to police testimony. Charged earlier this summer in Douglas County Circuit Court with counts related to the crash, Brooks pleaded not guilty.
Adam Lacy, 19, the second passenger in the car, told state police that Brooks drove upwards of 120 mph prior to the accident. All three men had been drinking, Lacy told police, and both Foltz and Lacy told Brooks to slow down,allegedly to no avail.
Police clocked the vehicle at 100 to 109 mph before it hit a railroad embankment in Arcola, went airborne, struck a utility pole 188 feet away and severed it, then struck another utility pole, flipped end over end and wound up upside down, according to testimony before the coroner’s jury.
Just that scene alone shows what such high speeds can do. Foltz was reportedly in the back seat and was wearing a seat belt, yet still was ejected from the car.
With that kind of impact, it’s a wonder any of them lived to tell about it.
Foltz did not, and the blame is placed on Brooks. Whether or not he will be held responsible, however, may be a separate issue.
All three men were, to some degree, responsible for being involved in the accident — and all, therefore, were to blame. Both passengers got into a vehicle with a driver they knew allegedly had been drinking. They didn’t have to do that.
Neither of them overpowered the allegedly reckless driver before he wrecked the car. And the driver, if the testimony all is eventually proven, certainly made himself responsible for the vehicle and its passengers when he turned the key in the ignition.
When it comes down to it, any of us can be to blame for certain events in our lives — and all of us can be held responsible, too. I’d like to see blame taken out of the dictionary and, instead, everyone held responsible for their actions.
No, it shouldn’t be McDonald’s that’s to blame when some airhead spills hot coffee on herself and gets burned. Miss Airhead should take responsibility for being dense.
It’s not Average Car Driver who should be blamed when Bicycle/Phone Guy veers into traffic and gets hit by a car. It’s Mr. Multitasker on a bike who should take the responsibility for being a doofus.
Blame won’t reverse time and keep a fast-food customer from getting burned. Blame won’t bring back Matt Foltz, or countless other victims of alleged reckless actions by others or themselves.
Brooks shouldn’t have to be given the blame. Instead, he should take the responsibility for any actions of his that harmed anyone. If he is tried in court for homicide and found guilty, he will be “blamed” according to the law. But what does that change? What good does it do?
He should be responsible and do anything he can to off-balance his alleged reckless actions, even though neither he nor anyone else can bring Matt Foltz back. If Brooks is indeed responsible for this tragedy, he isn’t the only one.
And what makes me bitter about this kind of thing is that no matter where either the blame or the responsibility lie, no assigning of either category changes the tears, the grief, the horrible effects.
So even when I see Bicycle/Phone Guy and I mock him and I shake my head at his stupidity, I still hope he gets where he’s going safely.
I’d hate for Aunt Edna to get a somber phone call from the funeral home, no matter who’s to blame.
I just hope Bicycle/Phone Guy will be more responsible than it looks like he is.
Add your comments
Not already registered? Then click Here.
Comment policy:
JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.
In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.
We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.
No comment may contain:
* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.
If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
|
|
|
My Point of View wrote on Aug 14, 2008 7:18 AM: