Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
82°F
If you could add a contest to Bagelfest what would it be?
More
Bagel toss
Bagel eating
Bagel stacking
Bagel recipes
Bagel crafts
View Results
 


















 
Thursday, August 7, 2008 9:33 PM CDT
COLUMN: Asking questions of Obama doesn't make questioner a racist



Some national polls show Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama tied at 44 percent each. McCain managed to erase the 9-point lead Obama held in the wake of his trip to the Middle East and Europe.

Even before the Iowa primary, the national news media behaved like Obama’s personal fan club. The press doesn’t need this; it only reinforces what millions of Americans already believe — we’re biased.

That this never dawned on the fawning media is the height of hypocrisy given its claim to impartiality. For months, the self-anointed arbitrator scoffed at the notion of flaming bias. But, lately, under the weight of the obvious, it’s scratching its head, wondering if the charge has merit. But, expect an admission — of course not.

Justification for the media’s stampede overseas with Obama held it was news. Which begs the question of why McCain didn’t get similar coverage when he visited foreign lands?

I’m not sure it serves Obama’s best interest in the long run to be treated like a rock star. Getting used to it courts the twin dangers of self arrogance and assumption.

The huge crowd roaring for Obama during his appearance on a Berlin stage did little to ground Obama in reality. He was treated like the president — rather than as one of two candidates for the Oval Office — rubbing elbows with some of the top leaders in the Middle East and Europe.

Europe’s embrace of Obama spawned from its blatant disdain for President George Bush. But, Obama does represent something new in American politics.

He really cannot be viewed as black or white. He is the melting pot America will truly become within the next century. It is in that vein he should be judged.

Yet, we struggle with the race thing. It’s convenient to leave on the doorstep of white America, but it’s not that simple. Racism claims no easy name. It is as much the domain of black as it is of white, red, yellow and hues between.

The charge of racism raised its flimsy head during the Democratic primaries when we saw the Clinton and Obama camps play gotcha. How many honorable men and women, long servants of America at its best, were tossed overboard in the interest of the ultimate terrorist — political correctness?

The Clinton camp has long complained the race card was played against it. There is some validity to that contention.

Last week McCain took Obama to task for comments he made during a stop in Missouri, saying Obama was implying the GOP was going to use the infamous race card against him.

“Nobody thinks that Bush or McCain have a real answer for the challenges we face,” Obama told the crowd. “So what they are going to try to do is make you scared of me. You know, he’s not patriotic enough. He’s got a funny name. You know, he doesn’t look like all of those other presidents on the dollar bills.”

Obama has used the line on several occasions. McCain is right. In this, Obama is playing the race card and it doesn’t appear to be by accident.

According to a story on June 20 by Reuters wire service, Obama said during a fundraiser in Florida, “They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?”

During the Democratic primaries, snippets of video tapes emerged showing Obama’s Chicago minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, damning the United States and spewing racial hatred.

We also witnessed tapes of Wright attacking Hillary Clinton, who, along with husband Bill, ex-president of the U.S., long championed civil rights.

Obama denied having ever heard Wright making such comments when he attended church. Obama attended Wright’s church for over 20 years. Wright presided at his wedding, baptized his children and acted as his spiritual adviser.

Obama’s book, “The Audacity of Hope,” paid tribute to the minister.

Obama’s claim to have no knowledge of what Wright was doing from the altar drew challenge.

The question raised was how the senator could have been a member of the super-sized church so long yet not be aware of the pastor’s inflammatory rants.

It was a valid question to ask Obama, but those who did incredulously were accused of being racists.

Wright did himself in eventually, wallowing in bigotry and hate during several public appearances broadcast live on TV.

Those exhibitions reinforced the need for a straight, believable answer from Obama.

I posed the question in several columns and was accused of being a racist by some anonymous posters on JG/T-C online. There’s nothing I respect more than people who are afraid to attach their names to their opinions.

The author of one letter to the editor accused me of making a racist statement in one of the columns.

Actually, he ventured, it was a statement I meant to say although I didn’t say it.

Of course this baffled me because I generally say what I’m saying.

I do admit people sometimes don’t know what I’m saying because I slur. I could blame it on the sad state of my hearing, but I won’t excuse myself that easily.

I could blame it on the fact my hearing aids squeal when I don’t put them in right. But, I won’t.

I’ve been reading movie subtitles for years, reading people’s lips and saying, “Huh?”

Thanks to the nifty devices I can hear a gossip in a crowded room from the curb.

In any case, I don’t much like people who try to pigeon-hole me in terms of politics, religion and the Iraq war.

I will say, however, when it comes to pies, I’m a peach man.

I believe in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and unbending individualism. I’ve never been big on teamwork as my high school football coach would attest to.

I believe heavy-handed attempts to shut people up by yelling racism should be met at every turn by good old American determination not to be bullied.


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


miltmart wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:50 PM:

" Mr. Reynolds, I'm sure you know that you will once again be labeled as a racist by those same anonymous posters simply because you wrote an honest, forthright column. "

Locke wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:53 PM:

" If this has anything remotely to do with the letter from Jack, then you are flat out wrong Harry. Jack's letter was racist.

Why was it racist? It contained facts that were unrelated to Obama -- facts that could be used to diminish the credibility of all African-American politicans, by associating their skin color to those of African despots.

I am, suprisingly, proud of the Coles County community for (nearly) universally chastizing Jack for his baseless letter. I am, however, sad that the JG-TC offered no apology -- not suprising since the paper has relatively few African-American subscribers. "

miltmart wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:31 PM:

" Sigh, once again the intolerance of the oh-so-tolerant. How does that go? You have every right to say what you think as long as what you say agrees with what I believe? Something like that? "

Read all over wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:51 PM:

" This analysis begins at some distance from reality. From a July 27 UPI article:

"LOS ANGELES, July 27 (UPI) -- U.S. broadcast networks had more negative coverage of Barack Obama than John McCain during the first weeks of the general election campaign, a study indicated.

The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University in Virginia, which has studied network news since the 1980s, analyzed content on ABC, CBS and NBC news shows and found that when reporters and anchors expressed opinions they were significantly more negative toward Obama and more positive toward McCain, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday.

The researchers found that most statements by anchors and reporters were neutral, but when opinions were expressed 28 percent of statements about Obama were positive while 72 percent were negative. The study indicated opinions about McCain were 43 percent positive and 57 percent negative."

You're entitled to your own opinions, Mr. Reynolds, but not your own facts. "

Rotty wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:34 PM:

" Harry, you had a pretty good column going until you had to open your mouth up, er.... type about anonymous posters, yet again.
After that, your column was pretty well a down hill slide.

Now, let's take your last paragraph, & make one change to it.

"I believe heavy-handed attempts to shut people up by yelling "anonymous posters are afraid" should be met at every turn by good old American determination not to be bullied."

Catch my drift, Harry?

The one who trash talks anonymous posters, yet has an imaginary angel named Goldenrod?

Pretty hypocritical, if you ask me. "

RavenH4 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 7:40 AM:

" Read all over- I'm so thrilled that you used The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University.

Because I'm sure you will respect their analysis of the most fair and balanced news network on tv: FOXNEWS!

Center For Media and Public Affairs Finds Fox News Most Balanced
Posted on December 27th, 2007

"Fox News Channels coverage was more balanced towards both parties than the broadcast networks were. On FOX, evaluations of all Democratic candidates combined were split evenly- 51% positive vs 49% negative, as were all evaluations of GOP candidates- 49% positive vs 51% negative, producing a perfectly balanced 50-50 split for all candidates of both parties."

"On the three broadcast networks, opinion on Democratic candidates split 47% positive vs 53% negative, while evaluations of Republicans were more negative- 40% positive vs 60% negative. For both parties combined, network evaluations were almost 3 to 2 negative in tone, i.e. 41% positive and 59% negative."
------

Now go ahead- Read all over,
Admit it. FoxNews IS the most fair and balanced network there is.
After all, Read all over;
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.

ROFLMAO!!!! "

cd wrote on Aug 8, 2008 10:11 AM:

" I supposed the following information is racistist also, (since it is against Obama.

==========================================================================

Proposed changes in taxes after the 2008 General election:

==========================================================================

CAPITAL GAINS TAX

MCCAIN 0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home (couples).
McCain does not propose any change in existing home sales income tax.

OBAMA 28% on profit from ALL home sales

How does this affect you? If you sell your home and make a profit, you will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income from their homes as part of their retirement income.

==========================================================================

DIVIDEND TAX

MCCAIN 15% (no change)

OBAMA 39.6%

How will this affect you? If you have any money invested in stock market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama becomes president. The experts predict that 'Higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.'

==========================================================================

INCOME TAX

MCCAIN (no changes)

Single making 30K - tax $4,500

Single making 50K - tax $12,500

Single making 75K - tax $18,750

Married making 60K- tax $9,000

Married making 75K - tax $18,750

Married making 125K - tax $31,250



OBAMA (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)

Single making 30K - tax $8,400

Single making 50K - tax $14,000

Single making 75K - tax $23,250

Married making 60K - tax $16,800

Married making 75K - tax $21,000

Married making 125K - tax $38,750

Under Obama, your taxes could almost double!

==========================================================================

INHERITANCE TAX

MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)

OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax

Many families have lost businesses, farms, ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose them to these taxes.

==========================================================================

NEW TAXES PROPOSED BY OBAMA

New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than 2400 square feet.

New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren't high enough already)

New taxes on natural resources consumption (heating gas, water, electricity)

New taxes on retirement accounts, and last but not least....

New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so we can receive the same level of medical care as other third-world countries!!!

==========================================================================

You can verify a lot of the above at the following web sites:

http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/election/2008/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/election/2008/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.taxes.html

http://elections.foxnews.com/?s=proposed+taxes

http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/politics/articles/mccain_obama_offer_different_visions_on_taxes.html<

http://bulletn.aarp.org/yourworld/politics/articles/mccain_obama_offer_different_visions_on_taxes.html>

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/barack_obama/

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/barack_obama/>

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/john_mccain/

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/john_mccain/>
===============
I reported, you decide. "

Read all over wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:14 AM:

" @ RavenH4:

I'm not a fan of Fox at all. My point is simply is HR's claims about media coverage of Obama seem to be at a distance from reality. It's McCain, I would say, who's getting a free ride from the mainstream media. (In our own little corner of the universe, the JG-TC's own coverage of Obama is overwhelming negative.)

The Washington Post: "The Center describes itself as nonpartisan, and its studies have been cited by both conservative and liberal commentators." If the Center was following a conservative line, wouldn't it be claiming, as is HR, that the press favors Obama? "

RavenH4 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:19 PM:

" (Read all over), well I AM a FoxNews fan.

And thanks for further validating their "Fair and Balanced" claim!

You better tell the Liberals that "The Center describes itself as nonpartisan, and its studies have been cited by both conservative and liberal commentators."

Cause you got some splainin' to do! "

miltmart wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:21 PM:

" ReadAllOver wrote: "It's McCain, I would say, who's getting a free ride from the mainstream media. (In our own little corner of the universe, the JG-TC's own coverage of Obama is overwhelming negative.)"

You're kidding, right? And please cite some instances where the jg'tc's coverage of Obama is overwhelmingly negative. "

even steven wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:47 PM:

" Alfred E. Obama?

Mad Magazine strikes again!

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-mad-magazine-is-here.html "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:56 PM:

" God bless freedom of speech but Jack Pierce's letter was racist and demeaning. People spoke out about that and not in a bullying manner. We have a right to call people out on racism. It goes along with that good ol freedom of speech. Harry reynolds just has the right to be a little more opinionated than us bloggers. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 8, 2008 3:13 PM:

" The next thing we know the Loony Tunes side will be claiming Rush Limbaugh is fair and balanced. LOL!.... "

gringa wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:06 PM:

" Read all over, you've got to be kidding. As an example of the type of coverage this newspaper gives Obama versus McCain all you have to do is compare the two AP stories appearing on this morning's edition, page A8.

The top story about Obama is a puff-job about his vacation to Hawaii, wherein Obama's multiracial island life is said to be the basis for his *spirit of tolerance*. (Definition of Obama's tolerance: I'll accept your opinion as long as it's identical to mine.)

The story below that one is about McCain. It doesn't take long for the AP story to turn negative as AP matter of factly ties him to the loss of 8,000 jobs at a DHL shipping site in Ohio.

Happens every day, over and over and over. And yet, with as much help as he's getting from the MSM, Obama still can't pull out ahead. Tell me a lot of folks must be listening to FNC - where they can get the news Fair and Balanced! "

Read all over wrote on Aug 8, 2008 5:38 PM:

" Look at the headline on the McCain article: what does it suggest the article is going to be about?

Looking at the paper over weeks and weeks leaves me with a clear impression that there's much more news about Obama, much of it negative. McCain gets, often, a free pass. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:22 PM:

" Wow, those retired janitors from EIU seem to have a lot of spare time. LOL! "

miltmart wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:22 PM:

" HP: I'd like you to explain your comment about retired janitors. You certainly were not making any comment that might be construed as bigoted or, at the very least, arrogant and superior, would you? I suspect some of those 'retired janitors' you seem intent on demeaning are a lot smarter in a lot of ways than some of the obviously over-educated, elitist former professors with too much time on their hands who post on here all the time. "

miltmart wrote on Aug 8, 2008 10:34 PM:

" Read allover, you might try reading those articles from today's paper which prove the point that McCain, at least in this instance, gets the negative coverage. The Obama article is a puff piece about how hard he had it growing up. The McCain piece is determined to blame him for the loss of 8000 jobs because of a merger one of his staff members was involved with years ago that, down the road, ended up costing jobs. Something the article even says could not have been foreseen. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:07 AM:

" miltmart wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:22 PM:

" HP: I'd like you to explain your comment about retired janitors. You certainly were not making any comment that might be construed as bigoted or, at the very least, arrogant and superior, would you? I suspect some of those 'retired janitors' you seem intent on demeaning are a lot smarter in a lot of ways than some of the obviously over-educated, elitist former professors with too much time on their hands who post on here all the time. "

Good grief, miltmart, don't you think that might have been a slight over reaction on your part to my post?

I don't feel any obligation to respond to your question, but I will explain anyway....

First of all, it was merely a dig at another poster who has identified himself as a retired janitor from EIU, and who has certainly given me a lot of digs in the past. Just how do you get the idea that I was demeaning anyone? Simply referring to some ones line of work, that they, themself, had disclosed, as demeaning is quite a jump in logic, don't you think?

Secondly your angry response was rather silly. I didn't take an elitist stand on anything. Did you see me trying to make any correlation between any one's level of education, intelligence career choice or anything else?

No, as a matter of fact you are the one who chose to attack a certain group, that is the retired professors from EIU. This group has come under attack on several occasions, and I don't seem to recall you coming to their rescue. Why is that? It's called hypocrisy, miltie.

I love how you over reacted to a little comment that you perceived was over the top, but ignore some of the most vile, putrid, hateful name calling that goes on all the time on here. Are you going to get your panties in a bunch the next time some right winger goes on one of his name calling tirades? I doubt it. I would be happy to point it out to you, the next time it happens. I suspect you spend a lot of time gleaning messages from the left side to react to.

But the next time someone attacks me on here, it's good to know that your will come to my rescue?.... Now wasn't that silly? I merely made that statement to show you how silly you look at times.

In closing, let me put this as simply as I can, it was a joke! You are obviously not blessed with a sense of humor. "

miltmart wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:17 AM:

" And HP I would call your response an overreaction to what you perceive as my overreaction. A bit of guilt perhaps? Oh no, I'm sorry, just my lack of a sense of humor about EIU janitors. We all know what a barrel of laughs left-wingers are as we see it on these blogs all the time. That is if you find the president of the United States called names like chimp and monkey funny. Guess some do; doesn't work for me. "

Longtimegone wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:58 AM:

" What a lousy choice the poli,s in daleyville and dog charlie have given us for president. A half breed and a brown nosing toady. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 9, 2008 5:36 PM:

" I give up, miltmaart. I guess you just don't get it. LOL! "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:07 PM:

" Doing their best to try to tie the Edwards affair to Obama, Fox radio's question for the day was: will the Edwards scandal hurt Obama? LOL! Good old fair and balanced Fox news! I'm sure, being fair and balanced and all, they will follow up with the following question: will the fact that McCain had a sexual tryst with a women almost 20 years his junior, while he wife was confined to a wheelchair, hurt his chances?

I guess with Fox, it's guilt by (same party) association.

I suspect Fox will try to drag this story out for as long as they can. "

The Question wrote on Aug 11, 2008 11:04 AM:

" Fox News anchor Greg Jarrett continued spewing his scripted Republican talking points about Edwards over the weekend, Harry.
Fox is very sorry that Edwards isn't the Democratic nominee right now, Harry, so they are trying to pretend that he is. "

The Question wrote on Aug 11, 2008 11:08 AM:

" Longtimegone wrote, "What a lousy choice the poli,s in daleyville and dog charlie have given us for president. A half breed and a brown nosing toady."
-------------
Well, here's one writer who certainly isn't "bullied" by "heavy-handed attempts to shut people up by yelling racism," is he, Mr. Reynolds? "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 11:40 AM:

" Fox News actually was making fun of Obama last night for eating pancakes!!!!!!!! Thats how bad their reporting has become that we are seriously making a story out of who is eating what! "

Becky wrote on Aug 11, 2008 4:02 PM:

" cd: If your post is true, why did FOX news yesterday report that when all is said and done, with Obama's tax plan, the average american who earns $40K would save over $800 in taxes. With McCain's, they would only save $118? Since the decider decided to spend, spend, spend and then spend some more, we are now in the most debilitating economic deficit in the history of THE WORLD! Our great-great grandchildren will still by trying to pay off his stupid decisions. We need to get some money back in by just letting Bush's tax cuts expire. Like I've said before, I HATE taxes and what DC has done with OUR MONEY!!!! But, I cannot in good conscience give our children this financial burden. If we don't do something now, our children will have to pay 85% in taxes!!!! Is that fair? Obama's tax proposal is at least a beginning of an answer. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 11, 2008 6:50 PM:

" Fox news practices journalism, just like poor college students used to throw spaghetti at the wall to see if it was done and would stick, they throw all the crap out there to see what will stick.

The funny part is that Edwards isn't even the candidate and their own candidate did the same thing, and they have NEVER mentioned it to my knowledge. McCain doesn't have to take the low road here, Fixed news is carrying his water for him. LOL!

It's going to be fun to see how long Fox will try to milk this story, and I suspect it will be quite a bit longer than they spent on Larry Craig (adult male) and Mark Foley (little boys) sex scandals. "

Locke wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:28 PM:

" Fox News is overtly bias.

The John Edwards story has been on non-stop coverage from Friday evening until Monday evening. Meanwhile, Russian and Georgia went to war.

They do tend to give equal time to both candidates. Whenever McCain has a new ad they run the ad, have a McCain staff member on to discuss how the ad is 'true', and usually read a press release from the Obama camp. Whenever Obama is in the news, they will generally roast him by getting opinions by Karl Rove.

Right now, Jon Voight is on O'Reilly and O'Reilly is comparing liberals to communists, claiming conservatives are being blacklisted, mocking Obama as being sensative, and talking about how Hamas supports Obama.

Of course, the mainstream media is left-leaning, so Fox is just reporting the other side of the coin. In truth, you can't change fact, but you can drown out all other stories until a certain perspective of the world is gained. It's call propaganda and it worked very well in the 1930s in Germany. "

Early Bird wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:33 AM:

" Faux news on line has 5 separate hit pieces on John Edwards today, all dealing with his affair, and not a word about McCain's history of infidelity.

Hmmm...fair and balanced, huh? LOL! "

Early Bird wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:41 AM:

" They do tend to give equal time to both candidates. Whenever McCain has a new ad they run the ad, have a McCain staff member on to discuss how the ad is 'true', and usually read a press release from the Obama camp. Whenever Obama is in the news, they will generally roast him by getting opinions by Karl Rove.

Excellent example of their fair and balanced reporting, Locke.

Another thing I've noticed is that when they interview a Dem they spend a lot of time arguing with him or her, while interviewing a Repub, they seem to be nodding their head in agreement a lot.

But, as our brainwashed friend says, thank God for the folks at the FNC. LOL! "

The Question wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:24 AM:

" Of course, the mainstream media is left-leaning, so Fox is just reporting the other side of the coin.
---------
You're wrong there, Locke. The corporate media is anything but left-leaning, as demonstrated their lockstep, propaganda-waving march to war based on Bush's lies. Phil Donahue got the ax for even raising questions about it. Fox News is just the worst of a generally right-wing lot.
Liberal opinions regularly get an airing only on three commercial TV news shows, and two of those are comedies. "

RushBaby wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:31 AM:

" Hey, you know who was right all along on Russia? John McCain

John McCain took a lot of criticism for his hard line on Vladimir Putins Russia over the last few years from end-of-history believers and other optimists in the punditry. Now that McCains assessment of Russia has proven accurate, the New York Times recognizes that his long-held positions suddenly have a lot more credibility:

http://tinyurl.com/6fe95l


And Obama? Looking less credible:

"While Mr. McCain has long called for excluding Russia from the Group of 8, and isolating it on the world stage, his probable Democratic opponent, Senator Barack Obama, has made clear he favors more engagement with Russia (even as he speaks of reviewing relationships with Russia, including its interest in joining the World Trade Organization)." "

RushBaby wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:42 AM:

" Louisiana Democrat Senator Mary Landrieu backs away from Obama

Call it a recognition of political reality for a Louisiana Democrat in 2008. Mary Landrieu has an uphill battle to retain her seat, one of the few bright spots on the electoral landscape in the Senate this year for the GOP. Landrieu apparently doesnt believe that Barack Obama helps her in that quest:

ABCNews- Louisiana Democrat De-Lists Self as Co-Host of Obama Fundraiser
August 11, 2008

"The Baton Rouge Advocate reports that Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., the only Senate Democrat in a competitive race this year, was listed as a co-host for a $100-per-person DC fundraiser for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, until suddenly, she wasnt.

The event, Girls Night Out: Lipstick, Laughter and Libations, is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, August 18."
----

It appears that Landrieu considers Obama an albatross in her re-election bid. One wonders whether more Congressional Democrats in competitive races might not be reaching the same conclusion. "

The Question wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:53 AM:

" Hey, you know who was wrong all along on Iraq? Bush, Cheney, McCain and the whole warmonger Republican Party.
"Gee, those WMD have got to be here SOMEWHERE. Heh-heh-heh!"
And by the way, didn't Bush gaze deeply in Putin's lovely eyes and claim that he had seen Putin's "soul?"
Maybe Bush should give Putin's beautiful soul a ringy-dingy on the hot line and ask what the heck it's up to. "

The Question wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:08 AM:

" The credit card bubble is going to be the next exploding U.S. economic disaster, and Fox News needs to keep its audience clueless about it while corporate America quietly maneuvers to leave them holding the bag.
So bring on the Democratic sex scandals, baby! "

RushBaby wrote on Aug 12, 2008 1:03 PM:

" Did Obama amplify pork for bundlers?

The Adler Planetarium has found a lot more money since its trustees began bundling for Obama:

TheNextRight.Com- "The Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Frank Clark, stands out amongst Obama supporters. On Sen. Obamas website, Mr. Clark is listed as a bundler who raised in excess of $200,000 for the Senators Presidential campaign. In 2004, Mr. Clark donated $5,000 to the then State Senator Obamas U.S. Senate bid. In 2005, Mr. Clark became the Chairman of the Board at Adler Planetarium, and in 2006 Sen. Obama earmarked $300,000 to the Planetarium. Then, in the same year that Mr. Clarks involvement in the Obama campaign skyrocketed to raising an excess of $200,000, Sen. Obamas earmark for the Adler Planetarium increased tenfold to $3,000,000.

Mr. Clark isnt the only problematic donor. Two of the Vice Chairmen of the Board, Brian Cressey and Peter Thompson are also significant donors. Between donations from Mr. Thompson and the Cressey household, Sen. Obama received $13,800. The most significant donor here is Mr. Cressey. As a first time donor, Mr. Cressey gave the maximum possible individual donation in essentially one big check. What makes this even more troubling is that Mr. Cressey had never given to Sen. Obama before 2008, the year in which the Adler Planetariums earmark increased tenfold.

The fact that three ranking members of the Adler Planetariums Board donated huge sums of money (at least $200,000) is interesting by itself. The fact that these enormous contributions came in the same year that Sen. Obama increased their earmark by 900% is truly unsettling."
------

Unsettling, business as usual, or both? Barack Obama won momentum and eventually his partys nomination by casting himself as something new, an outsider who could reform Washington. Unfortunately, as this shows, it looks like Obama feels right at home inside the Beltway. Hes already granting taxpayer money as spoils to his bundlers, and hes only been in the Senate three years.

Of course, if voters really want change, they could elect John McCain. He doesnt earmark funds at all. Obama offers nothing more than cheap sloganeering on top of a well-seasoned Chicago machine politician. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:48 PM:

" Hey Rush, how about the low down on some of McCain's backers. No special interests there, I'll bet. Now that you're back in full swing, when are you going to start calling all of us libtards? Or perhaps tin foil hat wearers? LOL! "

The Question wrote on Aug 12, 2008 6:45 PM:

" McCain and Bush may be of the upper crust, but it's clear to all who observe them that they're not very bright. Obama, on the other hand, clearly was paying attention at Harvard. That's why the (elitist) label sticks to him. Excessive intelligence is a liability in American political campaigns; there can be no doubt of that, and when people speak of Obama as "not one of us," that is, at least in part, what they're talking about. It's anti-intellectualism that brought us eight years of Bush, as well as eight years of Reagan. Americans love a simple-talkin' good ol' boy, even if he does lower their wages and spend their retirement.
Allan Uthman "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 6:56 PM:

" A wise man once said that a working man voting Republican was akin to a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:20 PM:

" Today, Barack Obama criticized John McCain for mistakenly saying that Iran was sending aid to al Qaeda in Iraq, which is not true. And afterwards, President Bush told McCain, 'Don't worry about it. I didn't know that either.'" --Jay Leno "

RushBaby wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:25 PM:

" No- that wasn't a "wise man" Harry.

That was a Liberal. LOL! "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:53 PM:

" Hey rush you and Blagojevich outta hook up for a conversation some time. "

injustice85 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:09 PM:

" It really doesn't matter how the race issue is handled because it isn't going away. Everyone has a right to their opinions and feelings about it obviously if we still allow the KKK to run around. I wrote that because Barack realizes our history of white presidents wasn't good that I was voting for him. Everybody thought that meant I was voting for Barack simply because he's black but what I meant was he actually realizes that the past presidents have messed up whereas people like McCain think things have been peachy and everythings working fine. Everyone still wanted to make it a racial issue like I would actually vote for someone simply for their color or gender. No not everyone asking questions of Obama is racist nor is the majority I imagine but questions and comments differ and some comments are demeaning. "

Cognitus wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:10 AM:

" INHERITANCE TAX

MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)

OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax

Many families have lost businesses, farms, ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose them to these taxes.
======================================
I seem to remember in a recent Congressional hearing, a group of farmers from IOWA were asked to name specific farm families who had lost their farms due to inheritance tax.
The Iowa group could not name a single one. "

father bob wrote on Aug 13, 2008 4:02 PM:

" Harry Potter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:48 PM:
" Hey Rush, how about the low down on some of McCain's backers. No special interests there, I'll bet. Now that you're back in full swing, when are you going to start calling all of us libtards? Or perhaps tin foil hat wearers? LOL! """"

mccain has taken almost a BILLION dollars in lobbyist money since he's been in office. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 13, 2008 7:30 PM:

" It's interesting that when ever the topic in inheritance tax comes up, the family farm example is ALWAYS used. Thanks for the truth on that one, Cognitus. "

RushBaby wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:32 PM:

" Shocker: Obama takes lobbyist money

Barack Obama announced that my party would not take donations from federally-registered lobbyists or their PACs. Somehow, that news failed to make it to his own campaign. Roll Call took a peek at lobbying disclosures for the first half of 2008, and discovered $15,000 of donations from dozens of lobbyists:



RollCall July 30, 2008 - "Lobbyists might be persona non grata on the presidential campaign trail, but that hasnt put them off of donating to the presumptive Democratic nominee, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.).

Obama has pledged to forgo contributions from federally registered lobbyists. Yet, more than 40 have donated nearly $15,000 to his presidential campaign this year, according to records recently filed with the Senate and House.

The latest tally, as of Tuesday, comes as lobbyists have begun filing their LD-203 forms, a requirement of the Honest Government and Open Leadership Act of 2007. The provision requires lobbyists and all lobbying organizations to file forms to the Senate and House by July 30 and Jan. 30 that list ties to political action committees, federal campaign contributions over $200 and expenditures for events that honor officials covered by the law." "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:10 PM:

" Pretty ironic, that the only Republican with a prescription drug plan is Rush Limbaugh. Actually today Rush said he would have no comment on his drug problem until he could figure out a way to blame it on the Clinton's." Jay Leno

You gotta love the old boy chasing drug addict, Rush Limbaugh. "

Harry Potter wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:51 PM:

" Q: What is the difference between Rush Limbaugh and the Hindenburg?


A: One is a flaming fascist gasbag full of hot air, and the other is a dirigible. "

 


©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us