Thursday, May 1, 2008 9:56 PM CDT
COLUMN: Wright's 'rants' put meat on bones of his video snippets on TV
By HARRY REYNOLDS, Editorial page editor hreynolds@jg-tc.com
Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s “bunch of rants” earlier this week put meat on the bones of the videos of the pastor attacking the U.S.
The snippets, taken from sermons Barack Obama’s pastor made over a number of years, were condemned as being taken out of context and not representative of a respected black liberation theologian.
The snippets included “G-damn” America, “the chickens have come home to roost” (shortly after 9/11), and claims the government created the AIDS virus to destroy “people of color.”
TV news networks and the Internet broadcast them repetitively. Pundits of all colors and persuasion argued the obvious question raised by the snippets:
How could Obama have attended Wright’s church for 20 years and yet claim to have never heard about, or witnessed, the venom his mentor spewed from the pulpit?
The same people condemning the broadcasting of the snippets accepted hook, line and sinker Obama’s claim of ignorance. Over two decades, a polished, highly intelligent man, keenly aware of what was going on around him, didn’t know what was going on in his own church.
Which spawns another question: If Obama didn’t know what was going on in his own church, how can he be entrusted to lead the nation?
In the wake of the videos, Obama made a televised speech, widely lauded, condemning the pastor’s remarks. Obama did not leave the church or repudiate Wright, saying, “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.”
The uproar over the snippets came while Obama was trying to cut into rival Hillary Clinton’s lead in the Pennsylvania primary campaign. The damage wrought by Wright, coupled with Obama’s comments to an audience of rich liberals in San Francisco about gun-loving, blue-collar voters clinging to their religion and distrustful of those different than themselves, cost Obama dearly in Pennsylvania.
It also set him up for a tough primary fight in Indiana, that state having its share of blue-collar workers. In North Carolina, which has its ranks of gun-loving, Bible clingers, Obama hoped to win big next Tuesday.
And then, came along the pastor. Wright couldn’t keep quiet. Apparently piqued by Obama’s condemnation of his earlier sermons, the pastor consciously, or unconsciously, yearned to do more damage.
In an interview on PBS with Bill Moyers last Friday night, Wright said his sermons were taken out of context. It was a thoughtful interview up to the point where the pastor said he didn’t begrudge Obama for condemning him.
Wright didn’t stop there. He volunteered Obama was “...a politician. I’m a minister. We speak to two different audiences. And he says what he says as a politician. But, they’re two different worlds.”
Assuming that’s true, Obama condemned the pastor’s remarks, not because he disagreed with Wright, but because he wanted to win...wink, wink.
Wright threw gasoline on the fire Monday. Addressing and taking questions at the National Press Association, he said, “This is not about Obama, McCain, Hillary, Bill or Chelsea, this is about the black church.”
Wright implied again that Obama’s criticism of him was a matter of politician expediency, not sincerity. “He has to distance himself because he’s a politician. Whether he gets elected or not, I’m still going to have to be answerable to God.”
During the speech — televised nationwide — Wright called the government imperialist and repeated his assertion the U.S. invented the HIV virus as a means of genocide against blacks and other minorities.
Obama came out swinging Tuesday, saying he was “outraged” and “saddened by that spectacle that we saw yesterday.” Obama was particularly angered by Wright’s implication that he secretly agreed with him.
“All it was was a bunch of rants that weren’t grounded in fact,” Obama said.
“Obviously, whatever relationship I had with Reverend Wright has changed. I don’t think he showed much concern for me, more importantly, I don’t think he showed much concern for what we’re trying to do in this campaign.”
Wright’s antics, coming at this late hour before the Indiana and North Carolina primaries could cost Obama dearly. The race in Indiana is close, and a few days ago, the governor of North Carolina came out for Clinton. And the governor is very popular, particularly with blue-collar voters.
As much as Wright is to blame for the mess Obama finds himself in, part of the problem Obama created himself by failing to distance himself long ago from the minister.
The question of what he knew about Wright and why he didn’t know will dog Obama from now until the end of his campaign for the Democratic nomination. And it will continue to dog him if he wins the nomination and faces John McCain in the presidential election in the fall.
As for Wright, he may be a brilliant theologian, but in his increasingly apparent efforts to destroy Obama as a viable candidate, he exhibits a real talent for Machiavellianism.
It could be Hillary or McCain going to the White House....because a question was not confronted and a preacher was thinking only of himself.
Add your comments
Not already registered? Then click Here.
Comment policy:
JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.
In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.
We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.
No comment may contain:
* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.
If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
|
|
|
longtimegone wrote on May 2, 2008 9:06 AM: