Now Driving Online Now Hiring Online Home Seller Subscribe to the JG-TC
16°F
Severe
Who should Democrats choose as their lieutenant governor candidate?
More
Thomas Castillo
Mike Boland
Terry Link
Other
View Results
 






 
Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:03 PM CDT
Letter: U.S. will use surrogates to nuke the Russians



Bush II’s capacity to be manipulated by Cheney-Wolfowitz appears to be open ended; with less than (2) years remaining of this genocidal duo rule, a new focus on Russia is now extant, in the form of nuclear shields at her borders. Poland-Chec Republic as prostitutes for the U.S.A. are ready made pawns in nuclear terrorism practiced by the West e.g. “we gottem’ — we use ‘em.”

Since America is the only nation to have used nuclear bombs as a weapon in an active war “to save lives” will try now to propagandize their use by a choice of surrogates whom will for money detonate one on command by the U.S. upon the target of it’s choice, namely Russia. Why? Answer, active maintenance of hegemonic superpower status. Note, any superpower hegemon can tolerate only one head — all others are lopped off as they emerge.

The character of superpower status is all about armaments. “who has ‘em and who don’t,” just now Russia-U.S.A. have the bulk of them with Canada-England (as two-bit stooges of the U.S.) meanwhile other nations, some have nukes, some navy, some army, some air force, but do not have a combination of all that the U.S. and Russia do, and a venue in which to use them except as petty pirates or thugs of the U.S. and/or Russia. Since Russia’s four-pronged armament capabilities are aging, U.S. superiority is more timely i.e. “use it or lose it,” Cheney-Wolfowitz have to “git ‘er dun” soon!

If Russian will collapses (under nuclear attack) protective shields becomes a non-issue in the present. How? Should Vladimir Putin submit to “vassalage” by the U.S. (like the other G-8 boot Iickers), American air, sea, space, and standing armies will take command of a weak, indigenous Russian military and replace its authority with U.S. commanders.

Timing and the above mean everything! Iraq and Russia are the hottest spots in the Cheney-Wolfowitz playbook. Why? Now-a-days new air bases in Iraq are a high priority, but Russia remains strategic in America’s remaining the “world’s only superpower” and must be eliminated! Either Putin submits to Washington, or will be “dirty”-bombed by a “third” party (Pakistan-Kazakhstan) where upon the U.S. invades to pre-empt any nuclear response by Russia, plus canceling national U.S. elections ’08! Empire indeed.


Share:          Submit to Reddit         Add to My Yahoo!Add to My Yahoo!   



  Add your comments

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Not already registered?
Then click Here.


JG-TC.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. Comments posted on Saturday may not be reviewed until Sunday afternoon.

In order to keep the page a set width, long lines (mostly long links) will be chopped. Try putting spaces in your links or consider using tinyurl.com to make a smaller link that you can include.

We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.

No comment may contain:

* Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
* Commercial product promotions.

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.


Rotty wrote on Jul 19, 2007 3:22 AM:

" hmmmm.... The "Strange" one speaks again. Please, Mr. Strange, for all of our sakes.... Don't give up your day job! "

Early Bird wrote on Jul 19, 2007 5:29 AM:

" Michael, you have written some pretty odd letters before, but I think you might have outdid yourself with this one. You seem to live in some sort of a Bizarro world at times. I would love to know where you get some of your ideas. "

attainedage wrote on Jul 19, 2007 8:48 AM:

" Yes, could be he's the reason for the expression "Stranger Danger". I'm guessing Michael Strange is Harry's contribution for the newsprint version of the Fairness Doctrine. "

RAK wrote on Jul 19, 2007 10:50 AM:

" Attacking Russia? Mr. Strange still seems to think we're in 1985. "

father bob wrote on Jul 19, 2007 11:50 AM:

" maybe you all should think again about your comments to Mr. Strange....or did you forget exactly who he's talking about? six years ago we would have never thought we would have lost writ of habeas corpus, be wire tapped, scrap the geneva convention, boycot the kyoto meetings, estrange ourselves from the world, spend a TRILLION dollars on illegal war, sell our ports to islamic nations, deem the executive office above all laws of the land, try to re-write the constitution..... "

AnitaS wrote on Jul 19, 2007 4:27 PM:

" Just when you thought the water was safe to drink... "

Charlie Watts wrote on Jul 19, 2007 4:46 PM:

" Michael, this makes me wonder just what name(s) you are using when you post to some of the topics on this web site. Another example of born without a brain, breathing, functioning, and God help us all, reproducing. "

Doh wrote on Jul 19, 2007 5:07 PM:

" father bob- you can't be serious. One of the first signs of insanity is when you find one of Michael Strange's letters making sense. "

Norsepersons wrote on Jul 19, 2007 6:15 PM:

" You have got to be kidding me. This is the type of tripe that I expect from some second rate shock-jock. The simple fact that The Soviet Union is far to fractured to mount a viable threat at this time should point to the fact that a nuclear escalation with them is a thing of the past. I would point out that if there was a possibility, the UN would be crying out for this to NOT happen. To the person that thinks that he has lost all of his/her rights to privacy. What makes you think that you are being watched? If you are, what do you have to hide that you are so worried about this? Mr. Strange better lay off whatever he is smoking while writing. "

Interested Observer wrote on Jul 19, 2007 8:34 PM:

" I find it interesting that you call Poland and the Czech Republic 'prostitutes' to the US. What exactly were they to the USSR, Mr. Strange? "

Mr. Peabody wrote on Jul 19, 2007 9:34 PM:

" WOLVERINES!!!!!!! "

Doh wrote on Jul 19, 2007 10:43 PM:

" OMG Mr. Peabody! It's Red Dawn!!! LOL! "

Rotty wrote on Jul 20, 2007 4:11 AM:

" LOL - Excellant post, Mr. Peabody! "

Collatine wrote on Jul 20, 2007 9:57 AM:

" *yawn* All Putin has to do is call his soul mate Bush and say, "Look if we get nuked, we're holding you and New York City personally responsible with our retaliation." End of drama. Seriously, Michael, you could be the next Tom Clancy though. You should flesh this plot line out in a novelization. "

father bob wrote on Jul 20, 2007 10:03 AM:

" no, i don't believe the contents of the article.....but he's words are no less of a display of freedom of speech than your rantings at each other...................and at the time i am typing this, "boy george" hadn't yet suspended that freedom. notice i said "YET". "

attainedage wrote on Jul 20, 2007 1:32 PM:

" Newsflash: Michael Strange, 73, Charleston, was ticketed for "improper backing following a collision at 2:43 pm Tuesday". I'm not sure what it really means when one 'improperly backs' FOLLOWING a collision, but I am certain that Bush will somehow get the blame for the whole ordeal. "

HmmHmm wrote on Jul 20, 2007 5:26 PM:

" What a moron. "

AnitaS wrote on Jul 20, 2007 10:26 PM:

" It's pretty bad when both the left and the right think someone is a loony bird. =D "

Doh wrote on Jul 21, 2007 12:55 PM:

" father bob - who said anything about Michael Strange's freedom of speech? He has every right there is to put his insanity on public display, and we have every right to agree or disagree with him. At least none of us will end up dead from radioactive poisoning like most of the Russians who have criticized Vladimir Putin. "

AnitaS wrote on Jul 21, 2007 6:05 PM:

" Doh - No kidding...there'd be a lot of dead Americans if that were the case. 8-0 "

Doh wrote on Jul 22, 2007 11:06 AM:

" Yeah Anita- father bob needs to spend a little time under the jurisdiction of Vladimir Putin. Maybe then he would get a feel for what it REALLY means to have no freedom of speech. I guarantee you, if that were to happen, he would kiss the soil of this land as soon as he made his hasty retreat home. "

AnitaS wrote on Jul 24, 2007 2:12 AM:

" Doh - yep. I have a feeling that a lot of the things that people here complain about wouldn't seem so bad if they'd spend some time elsewhere. "

PL wrote on Jul 24, 2007 3:26 PM:

" DOh, Anita's Just because this country allows more freedom then others does not mean that we are not living up to our full potential. So yes we are beter off then most, but that should never be a reason to halt progress. "

Doh wrote on Jul 24, 2007 11:03 PM:

" PL- now that would depend on your definition of "progress". "

AnitaS wrote on Jul 25, 2007 1:51 PM:

" I'm having a difficult time equating the propensity to whine with halting progress. I'm not sure how that connection could be made, PL... My thought is that if people whined less and appreciated what they have more, we'd make more progress, anyway. If all you do is focus on the negative and complain about how awful our country is, then what are you accomplishing? NOTHING. However, if you see something negative, and rather than complain, you look for a better way, THEN you are accomplishing something. Ya know what I'm saying? "

ItsJustDave wrote on Jul 25, 2007 7:19 PM:

" We're gonna help Nuke Russia? Umm.. I don't even know how to respond - and I'm rarely at a loss for words. "

Dohbaugh wrote on Jul 26, 2007 7:49 AM:

" Don't feel bad, Dave, most of us have a hard time responding to comrade Michael's blathering letters, that praise the failed communist form of government. He claims that the local paper often refuses to print his letters, because they say they make no sense, and if that is the case, they must be some real lulu's. Let's just hope that Michael never discovers this site, because if he does, we're in for quite a ride. I do have to admit that Michael does provide some fodder for this site, though. "

 

 




©2007 Journal Gazette and Times-Courier, divisions of Lee Enterprises.    JG/T-C Do Not Call Policy    Privacy Policy    Contact Us
Tab
Content